Starmer dumps doormat?

[Matthew Pemble]

On 16 January 2011 08:34, Peter Sommer <peter at pmsommer.com> wrote:

>
> So the prosecution route is via s 1 CMA 1990 -  maximum punishment (I am
> pretty sure):  5 years.
>
>
Now, if illegal interception was punishable by at least 5 years (max is
actually 2 on indictment, or a fine on summary), we'd finally have a use for
s2 CMA!

s1 CMA, unless I've missed something vital, is also a max of 2 years on
indictment (raised from 6 months by PCJA 2006)?

M.


-- 
Matthew Pemble
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/ukcrypto/attachments/20110116/4eef5b48/attachment.htm>