On 16 January 2011 08:34, Peter Sommer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter@pmsommer.com">peter@pmsommer.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
So the prosecution route is via s 1 CMA 1990 - maximum punishment (I am pretty sure): 5 years.<br><font color="#888888">
<br></font></blockquote><div><br>Now, if illegal interception was punishable by at least 5 years (max is actually 2 on indictment, or a fine on summary), we'd finally have a use for s2 CMA!<br><br>s1 CMA, unless I've missed something vital, is also a max of 2 years on indictment (raised from 6 months by PCJA 2006)?<br>
<br>M. <br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Matthew Pemble<br><br><br>