and select `Update' to get a new plan. The unticked trades will be
excluded from the voyage plan (if any) and also from the totals.
-<h3>Vessel capacity</h3>
+<h3><a name="capacity">Vessel capacity</a></h3>
If you don't specify a vessel or a vessel capacity, the trading plan
will not take into account the fact that your voyage will be on a ship
abbrevation instead. If the first term specifies only one of mass or
volume, all the subsequent terms may only adjust that same value.
-<h3>Expected losses</h3>
+<h3><a name="losses">Expected losses</a></h3>
In theory if you were guaranteed to have a trouble-free voyage it
would be worth trading goods at very low margins. However, in
$emsgstore
$perresult
$prefix => 'ts';
+$helpref => undef;
</%args>
<%perl>
my $stringval= $qa->{$thingstring};
id="<% $thingstring %>" name="<% $thingstring %>"
onchange="<%$p%>Needed();" onkeyup="<%$p%>Later();"
value="<% $stringval |h %>"
- >
+ ><% defined($helpref) ? "<a href=\"docs#$helpref\">[?]</a>" : '' %>
<br>
<div id="<%$p%>results"> </div><br>
Vessel or capacity:
<&| qtextstring, qa => $qa, dbh => $dbh, prefix => 'cs',
thingstring => 'capacitystring', emsgstore => \$emsg,
+ helpref => 'capacity',
perresult => sub {
($max_mass,$max_volume) = @_;
}
<&| qtextstring, qa => $qa, dbh => $dbh, prefix => 'll',
thingstring => 'lossperleague', emsgstore => \$emsg,
+ helpref => 'losses',
perresult => sub { ($lossperleaguepct)= @_; }
&>
- size=10
+ size=9
</&>
</table>