[PATCH] udevinfo patch

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:36:32PM +0500, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:24:39AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:21:29AM +0500, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:47:35AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:26:46AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > > > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:51:01PM -0800, Daniel Stekloff wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, it breaks the net device handling. I think we should change
> > > > libsysfs instead, not to return a class device for '/block', if
> > > > we want to fix it.
> > >
> > > /sys/block is considered a sysfs "class" and not a class_device. So,
> > > going by udevinfo's help, -p expects path to a class_device and _not_
> > > a class itself and hence option /sys/block with -p is not a valid query.
> > >
> > > Kay?
> >
> > Yes, it's invalid, but we shouldn't print major minor for a invalid
> > path. sysfs_open_class_device_path("/block") returns a device. If this is
> > the right behavior for libsysfs, I will change the get_device_type("/block")
> > not to return a 'b'-type.
>
> Libsysfs validates the path given to it for opening a class_device to be
> a valid directory; it does not however validate if the path is a valid
> class_device path. So, in the case of udevinfo, a 'b' type should not
> be returned if the path is just /sys/block or /sys/block/

This may prevent it.