I had `m' as both the message name and the total number of arguments.
@<type>_n @<arg>_n? \+\\
@<type>_{n+1} @<kw>_{n+1} @[= @<dflt>_{n+1}@],
$\ldots$,
@<type>_n @<arg>_n? \+\\
@<type>_{n+1} @<kw>_{n+1} @[= @<dflt>_{n+1}@],
$\ldots$,
- @<type>_m @<kw>_m @[= @<dflt>_m@]);
+ @<type>_{n'} @<kw>_{n'} @[= @<dflt>_{n'}@]);
\end{prog}
two entry points are defined: the usual `main' entry point which accepts a
variable number of arguments, and a `valist' entry point which accepts an
\end{prog}
two entry points are defined: the usual `main' entry point which accepts a
variable number of arguments, and a `valist' entry point which accepts an