After it confused Verity, clarify in the Unequal docs that the

Trivial and Recursive difficulty levels are available for custom
selection even though no preset uses them.

[originally from svn r7336]

diff --git a/puzzles.but b/puzzles.but
index 85b497d5dcccb95b90a2c629c38920d6edfec999..2ce1d895189df8df4214749f45e1b8c813a27d69 100644 (file)
--- a/puzzles.but
+++ b/puzzles.but
@@ -2087,8 +2087,9 @@ them. Your aim is to fully populate the grid with numbers such that:
 
 \b All the greater-than signs are satisfied. 
 
-In \q{Trivial} mode, there are no greater-than signs; the puzzle is
-to solve the \i{Latin square} only.
+In \q{Trivial} mode (available via the \q{Custom} game type
+selector), there are no greater-than signs; the puzzle is to solve
+the \i{Latin square} only.
 
 At the time of writing, this puzzle is appearing in the Guardian
 weekly under the name \q{\i{Futoshiki}}.
@@ -2137,10 +2138,11 @@ These parameters are available from the \q{Custom...} option on the
 \dt \e{Difficulty}
 
 \dd Controls the difficulty of the generated puzzle. At Trivial
-level, there are no greater-than signs (the puzzle is to solve the
-Latin square only); at Recursive level backtracking will be required
-(but the solution should still be unique); the levels in between
-require increasingly complex reasoning to avoid having to backtrack.
+level, there are no greater-than signs; the puzzle is to solve the
+Latin square only. At Recursive level (only available via the
+\q{Custom} game type selector) backtracking will be required, but
+the solution should still be unique. The levels in between require
+increasingly complex reasoning to avoid having to backtrack.