[Uram-rejections] VHF/UHF rig with detachable face - recommendations?

Tue Jul 3 22:49:04 BST 2018

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Gibber is a rude term to use to generalise about some of your fellow ng users

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Jul 03 18:40:57 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <2124606659.552158968.433836.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net> <phf33e$lid$2 at dont-email.me> <phfpfi$jmq$1 at dont-email.me> <w2N_C.646280$Pv4.496984 at fx23.am4>
> Subject: Re: VHF/UHF rig with detachable face - recommendations?
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> Message-ID: <FyO_C.680318$ny5.54593 at fx17.am4>
> X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:40:53 UTC
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 2260
> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 18:40:49 +0100
> 
> 
> "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com> wrote in message 
> news:w2N_C.646280$Pv4.496984 at fx23.am4...
> >
> > "FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3vKi at turner-smith.uK> wrote in message 
> > news:phfpfi$jmq$1 at dont-email.me...
> >> "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> wrote in message 
> >> news:phf33e$lid$2 at dont-email.me...
> >>> "Stephen Thomas Cole" <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> wrote in message 
> >>> news:2124606659.552158968.433836.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net...
> >>>> I'd like to get a new VHF/UHF rig for my car, one with a detachable 
> >>>> face so
> >>>> I can fit the body in the boot and run an extension cable to the front 
> >>>> of
> >>>> the car for the face. The Yaesu FT7900 looks pretty much perfect but I
> >>>> figured I might as well solicit any alternative options from the wise 
> >>>> old
> >>>> owls of ukram before I spend any money! :)
> >>>>
> >>>> So, what are your opinions?
> >>>>
> >>> my opinion is that v/uhf is dead because all the class Bs only ever 
> >>> wanted HF and all the 11m pirates now M3 and M6s only wanted HF .....
> >>>
> >> Last time I listened on HF (using a web SDR), I was surprised at how 
> >> quiet the bands, even 20m, were. Such stations as I heard were good 
> >> strong signals, so I think the SDR was OK. There simply isn't the 
> >> interest in AR that prevailed in the 60s and 70s.
> >
> > they are all there wondering where the propagation went.........
> got HF for none or little effort and they can't gibber on it...... 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbO+9QAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeHi4H/iK02vnbE+e/PSUX1zjyfHMv
rK1+YJoh/aEn9OaiUygxfRuESJ3JBBSoOGRXrs4EmAsMphFPtfw0iuPli+91/Qah
0ZwxwU5mP1NEiDAAt/7YvF5EYW6RLyM+V4rKquwTa5oRsifqk0D5/QqPdxp+/aUM
Kw92KReeRRZHyqvkTgqPHsxXP4X7UfCHftVLZP6r0u3uDKIChXtiYTIj4XBfV2ov
FkZF0jI0gsYzW6TYNpQp/g3xFg0K+UjAWdbsVOrEc4sIEpbHyCfDfctFMqgdVfxY
jdN8AT0m4aW4i4sWn/A7+k++KU5KJfp6MfTOwieSPNsDGy2i80hhY+3oN6hXhR4=
=cWIa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----