[Uram-rejections] VHF/UHF rig with detachable face - recommendations?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Too ambiguous



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

The moderator assumes that you posted this by mistake. It may be that
it quotes a previous post without adding your own comment, or the text
you have added may appear incomplete. We hope you will review and then
re-submit your message.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Mon Jul 02 16:28:42 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> Subject: Re: VHF/UHF rig with detachable face - recommendations?
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <2124606659.552158968.433836.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net>
>  <W1o_C.899402$nr7.665445 at fx31.am4> <WXo_C.787084$sc1.87569 at fx09.am4>
>  <1924455728.552235933.931374.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net>
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/52.8.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Language: en-GB
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Message-ID: <Iwr_C.1327030$MD7.139000 at fx14.am4>
> X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:28:40 UTC
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 2087
> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:28:41 +0100
> 
> On 02/07/2018 15:52, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
> > Jim GM4DHJ ... <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >> On 02/07/2018 12:31, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> >>> On 01/07/2018 18:32, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
> >>>> I'd like to get a new VHF/UHF rig for my car, one with a detachable
> >>>> face so
> >>>> I can fit the body in the boot and run an extension cable to the front of
> >>>> the car for the face. The Yaesu FT7900 looks pretty much perfect but I
> >>>> figured I might as well solicit any alternative options from the wise old
> >>>> owls of ukram before I spend any money! :)
> >>>>
> >>>> So, what are your opinions?
> >>>>
> >>> waste of time nobody is on 2m or 70cm ....
> >>
> >>
> >> get a 4m radio....4m is what 2m was like in the early 70's...no
> >> repeaters and everybody sitting on the calling channel ....very friendly
> >> and only moving if they have to...just like 145.800 Mc/s AM  .... and a
> >> home brew quarter wave is just a nice length for the car .....don't fall
> >> into the dual band trap...it is so last century ....
> >>
> > 
> > Ok, sounds interesting. What's a good 4m rig for the car?
> > 
> anytone made in china  ....
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbOl6vAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Mein0H/3PJ1P1vOMl3EPru/P7swfUw
fDgkfIo60PJDX2MCWWM04wVjNFc/YMJqYVqP1BTD78tOHur+yUgHrPkmaPoUzvA+
Ho8fl7Hogw88cUyU88reXajbiJ6p20Ak6vfPlzki97tRHpBA0jOsx9hZ9tRqOwsr
9Qi90LejIeQn6y0XOZxSkM2bBtRi9Qnb1lgdCjW6PM6xmgCVefcYRoyftpSZ6ZX6
8QPWxuqVON8nrzic18Q0JQD79Ls0SUoShrdDbzqg6kwfNsJsvf0yJMclSQWZTIbk
TfpWoEkJ87ULf1oRnWfPbA2SFkOtguXf4nFt7GIPecktUYqUMaJzeAGzadaXSFQ=
=aH3n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----