nbohm at ernest.net
Wed Dec 3 20:20:15 GMT 2014
On 03/12/2014 18:51, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:24:21PM +0000, Francis Davey wrote:
>> 2014-12-03 11:12 GMT+00:00 Nicholas Bohm <nbohm at ernest.net>:
>> The defence seems to assume a physical presentation of the tendered
>> payment which the creditor has a practical opportunity of taking.� That
>> would make it difficult to achieve with electronic money.� Perhaps if
>> electronic money comes into common use, the defence will adapt to it.
>> In practice a defendant would make a payment into court under rule 37.2:
>> and at the moment the court funds office much prefers a cheque.
> Indeed, it appears that the courts do not necessarily actually accept
> legal tender, so the concept appears to be utterly dead and buried
> and of no meaning whatsoever anymore.
This surprises me - do you have a source for it?
Contact and PGP key here <http://www.ernest.net/contact/index.htm>
More information about the ukcrypto