jon+ukcrypto at unequivocal.co.uk
Wed Dec 3 18:51:21 GMT 2014
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:24:21PM +0000, Francis Davey wrote:
> 2014-12-03 11:12 GMT+00:00 Nicholas Bohm <nbohm at ernest.net>:
> The defence seems to assume a physical presentation of the tendered
> payment which the creditor has a practical opportunity of taking. That
> would make it difficult to achieve with electronic money. Perhaps if
> electronic money comes into common use, the defence will adapt to it.
> In practice a defendant would make a payment into court under rule 37.2:
> and at the moment the court funds office much prefers a cheque.
Indeed, it appears that the courts do not necessarily actually accept
legal tender, so the concept appears to be utterly dead and buried
and of no meaning whatsoever anymore.
More information about the ukcrypto