A couple of salsa MRs for sysvinit - Yes/No to upload?

[Adam Borowski]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 01:36:55PM +0000, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> I've opened 2 MRs for sysvinit:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sysvinit/-/merge_requests/4 Update Spanish
> translation (Closes: #981479)

Errors from Salsa pipeline are false positives.

> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sysvinit/-/merge_requests/5 Recommend
> orphan-sysvinit-scripts (Closes: #981801)

Looks good.

> ..and I notice that Adam committed
> Update Brazillian translations (Closes: #972837)

Aye.

> which hasn't yet been uploaded.

As sysvinit is an Essential package, I did not want to go through the
Release Team for a single small change.

> I'm not an uploader of sysvinit, but obviously I could put all those
> together and push the result. MR 5 might be controversial, though?

I vote yes.

> In any case, if any of the uploaders have opinions, I'd love to hear them :)
> 
> I think we might more broadly want to look at which other bugs we want to
> try and get fixed for bullseye, but these are all simple fixes so seem worth
> doing anyway?

I perhaps too slavishly adhere to freeze rules and balk at making simple
but non-important fixes -- but if you think otherwise, please go ahead!
Your common sense is as good as mine.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Remember, the S in "IoT" stands for Security, while P stands
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ for Privacy.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀