Response to active removal of initscripts

[Matthew Vernon]

Hi,

On 16/09/2020 17:33, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 13/09/2020 12:52, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>> On 12/09/2020 23:08, Martin Steigerwald wrote:

>> I think the next step is probably to propose an NMU 
> 
> So that didn't result in hugs and puppies. It looks like Michael isn't 
> going to reply to my last message; I'll give him a bit more time, then 
> I'll drop leader@ a line to see if he has anything else to say.

I have now done so.

> I'm then away 19-26th, so I think we're probably looking at a TC 
> referral when I get back unless there's useful movement in the mean 
> time. I'd hoped we could have a useful discussion with Michael.

Regards,

Matthew