Response to active removal of initscripts

[Martin Steigerwald]

Matthew Vernon - 16.09.20, 18:33:01 CEST:
> On 13/09/2020 12:52, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > On 12/09/2020 23:08, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> >> Martin Steigerwald - 28.07.20, 19:10:41 CEST:
> >>> I now did, hoping for the best.
> >>> 
> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964139#32
> >>> 
> >>>> [1] https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002
> >> 
> >> No response whatsoever.
> >> 
> >> I have no idea how to proceed on this. Michael clearly does not
> >> appear to be cooperative on that one.
> >> 
> >> Any ideas? Maybe someone who is officially a Debian developer could
> >> follow
> >> up on this?
> > 
> > I think the next step is probably to propose an NMU
> 
> So that didn't result in hugs and puppies. It looks like Michael isn't
> going to reply to my last message; I'll give him a bit more time,
> then I'll drop leader@ a line to see if he has anything else to say.

AFAIR Jonathan is subscribed to this list, but dropping him a line is 
still a good idea. He might be following a lot of lists.

> I'm then away 19-26th, so I think we're probably looking at a TC
> referral when I get back unless there's useful movement in the mean
> time. I'd hoped we could have a useful discussion with Michael.

Thank you, Matthey.

Have a good away-time!

-- 
Martin