NMU (delayed/14) to fix two init compatibility issues

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 22:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 15/09/2020 21:15, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > 
> > > I read the reactions of Michael and can't believe this. It appears to me
> > > that he is not willing cooperate even a single bit at all. Without
> > > justification.
> > 
> > Without even engaging in basic dialogue.
> > 
> > I wish we could have solved this without asking CTTE…
> 
> Me too. But I think it's really important that we remain civil - getting 
> angry won't help at all.

FWIW I think one thing which might be missing is an explicit statement
to the maintainer that you (or a specific named someone who acks it)
will take responsibility for those bits of integration going forward
(assuming you/they are willing to of course).

Similarly 964139#32 had "I'm sure someone will ..." which isn't the
same as "I will ...".

I can see why without that sort of explicit named commitment a
maintainer might not want to engage if their concern is that they don't
want that ongoing burden themselves.

I'm not saying it'll actually help in this case but I think it would
surely strengthen any case to be made to others for accepting those
kinds of patches.

Ian.