Response to active removal of initscripts

[Adam Borowski]

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 02:56:52AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> On 03/07/20 02:35, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jul 2020, Lorenzo wrote:
> >>    the 'dep1 | dep2' very well IMHO, so let's try to get rid of that)
> > We can’t, the first alternative must be a real package,
> > says Policy.
> 
> ok then, let's fallback on the ugly 'systemd | facility'.

Another way is:
default-facility | facility
"default-facility" is not a real package but is providen by only a single
supplier per arch.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀                                       -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀