From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Fri Jul 17 10:24:21 2026 Return-path: To: billy at ..on.com Subject: Re: Re: Soived ! Pre-paid credit cards Re: apple age verification References: <113aj6b$1v57r$1@dont-email.me> <1101249310.06ddfd48@uninhabited.net> <113apjq$210j4$1@dont-email.me> <113bdrd$28imd$1@dont-email.me> <113csbr$2m2th$1@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: <113csbr$2m2th$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [178428026012665] reject blocklist Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:24:20 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Thank you for your message. However the moderators have rejected it because it appears to them that you have been attempting to disrupt the group by posting inappropriately. Examples of inappropriate posting include repeatedly posting a contribution that has already been rejected more than once by the moderators, or using an unacceptable posting name. You can find the group charter and moderation policy at: https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Thank you, - Moderator. ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Fri Jul 17 10:24:20 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eternal-september.org > Authentication-Results: name/ECAC55FC0E; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=anon.com > To: uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > From: "billy bookcase" > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Soived ! Pre-paid credit cards Re: apple age verification > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:24:08 +0100 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Message-ID: <113csbr$2m2th$1@dont-email.me> > References: <113aj6b$1v57r$1@dont-email.me> <1101249310.06ddfd48@uninhabited.net> <113apjq$210j4$1@dont-email.me> <113bdrd$28imd$1@dont-email.me> > Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:24:12 +0000 (UTC) > Cancel-Lock: sha1:jstn2GbvVPBvZsRbQFy5as6pqWY= sha256:7S3Udpe3RlYVx5fjEcJUy96lxUndRWkpkW3y3RhQ65w= sha1:+hOThEfIa1y/1lXYFCFTXPjJeTY= sha256:9nI7Dvz7sBw4PP0gvTaHn4yiCkte0V7NEFp8L/HmC6k= > X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 > X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18ZKOsKLUXoN8tws/nsPeNXnK9b6yT1CWPJChI4XajCXw== > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 > X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Priority: 3 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on smtp > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 38 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: Received: Received: Cancel-Lock: > > > "Roland Perry" wrote in message > news:hXizRJD7KcWqFAWj@perry.uk... > > In message <113bdrd$28imd$1@dont-email.me>, at 20:10:21 on Thu, 16 Jul 2026, > > Handsome Jack remarked: > > > >>>>If someone wants to post here exactly how to get one of these alleged > >>>>prepaid credit cards, I will get one and try to register it as the > >>>>payment method on my new (second hand) iphone. The outcome might answer > >>>>some of these questions, if I understand them right. > >>> > >>> You'll need to get yourself a TARDIS first, because the period of time > >>> under discussion was ten years ago, and things have changed since then. > >> > >>I see - I hadn't realised the thread was quite so pointless as that. > > > > It's called "history". So when I write some historical notes, and others who > > must have not been paying attention back in the day, say "that can't possibly > > have happened", then it's important to put the record straight. > > > > The evolution of payment methods is quite fascinating. > > Indeed. So that according to one person, around 10 - 15 years ago, in the > UK they were even offering Credit Cards that didn't offer any Credit. > > Although nobody else, has ever seen or heard of one of these cards. > > And then, when on a legal group of all places somebody had the > temerity to suggest that such a card, so described would clearly > fell foul of Sections 43 and 46 of the Consumer Credit Act of 1974 > that person simply ignored him. The same Consumer Credit Act of > 1974 which facilitates chargebacks under Section 75 > > And then, when that person pointed this out again he was removed > from the group so that others would never get to hear of it again. > > So that from now on, readers on uk.legal.moderated are only ever > going to get a censored sanitised version of history; one in > which the existence or not of these credit cards which weren't > in fact credit cards can no longer be mentioned at all. > > But instead will be obscured among a mass of totally irrelevant > detail about every other kind of payment card imaginable. > > War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength, a Card that > doesn't offer credit is known as a Credit Card > > Isn't Usenet Wonderful ! > > > > bb > > > > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmpZ9MQACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x7CnAgArFNsxGMhRfBo0xQp8kF32WK+MsD6NL/zNsdjnfkBLBp6H3TAZipUcwQC qmmxZ9Vwy+qm1LrxwBiFwl1Ybd651CxAvsWxyX1yKF8eEP9ELr0+GiiXJeSKTHBQ cADB4rSR3ASZEZz0hjnfMjJmNFUjV8XhdVj/M7HpFQVP8nBT35mHMgqbKVsYF4ZO fppaWuNH5YrQ8uUpTgEEEaRhGZZXeA/+TmmbGGywEAyutLt0rFqSJi1S4MlenDuT izx41f0ljqCjgHKaeCCqt1cHB6om8rT0gz3kOwm8So43i+4zX/nHillGGley3UHV h81F/fAGHA0bPsTR+ZPi4SZ7U6V37A== =Fqgo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----