From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Sun Jun 28 18:32:02 2026 Return-path: To: hex at ..seen.ac.am Subject: Re: Re: OT: It took 24 years ! References: <110gpep$22ujm$2@dont-email.me> <110pdck$22ujm$8@dont-email.me> <$LN0mGTmXUOqFA1F@perry.uk> <9daogmx1f.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <947qgmxutm.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <111g15u$2rf7v$1@dont-email.me> <2rb04ldgralmtkape8ek3cu6e0lmsmjjtq@4ax.com> <111r09o$3ito3$1@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [178265603313227] reject notnew Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 18:31:59 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too repetitive. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sun Jun 28 15:13:53 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uni-berlin.de; dkim=pass header.d=uni-berlin.de header.s=fub01 header.a=rsa-sha256 > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:From: Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To: References; bh=L+n7+NPUYKmvWXFReeu3ndB9zDMXGo4hIahpmTNkNhA=; t=1782656027; x=1783260827; b=SYmucoxn7kdEnmFDxWSGTGXQxyeLj065XjplD8Id/316j7W0kwS4lllJczjol 29vFjUvTGQURaK > From: Norman Wells > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: OT: It took 24 years ! > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 15:13:44 +0100 > Message-ID: > References: <110gpep$22ujm$2@dont-email.me> > <110pdck$22ujm$8@dont-email.me> > <$LN0mGTmXUOqFA1F@perry.uk> > <9daogmx1f.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> > <947qgmxutm.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> > <111g15u$2rf7v$1@dont-email.me> <2rb04ldgralmtkape8ek3cu6e0lmsmjjtq@4ax.com> > > <111r09o$3ito3$1@dont-email.me> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net 3X9XzrNOQqAqTqcdrzMhigODIukKC6JZiNGqvtanRqfQpYsg/I > Cancel-Lock: sha1:qwT8Q+Waqhp/vm6mA8a9hryI8Sw= sha256:k/zNK2sTsAjJ6/2RuijQvS1Ru8RLBlZ8lqh8ORKKswQ= > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Content-Language: en-GB > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 54 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.4 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 28/06/2026 12:24, Davey wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:48:20 +0100 > > Roland Perry wrote: > > > >> In message , at 09:13:27 on Sun, 28 > >> Jun 2026, Norman Wells remarked: > >>> > >>> Do you think any person has a right just to take what he wants, > >>> unlimited by time, even over several years, simply because someone > >>> has not told him he's got to pay? > >>> > >>> I don't. I think it falls squarely within the definition of theft > >>> set out in Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968. > >> > >> Not when the person has been making every effort to receive a bill. > > > > Indeed, that shows that he clearly had no intent to deprive anybody of > > any money. He did all he could. > > But nevertheless even after whatever attempts he made continued to take > the property of another without payment, which anyone would certainly > have known was required. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmpBWo8ACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x5sZQgAnSEI+Hwk7/dmgB3KFAlF2NmQ9/a6lI2sxM1vnpIYrPz54jmW8WdkxYgm LlE1jRNQwwaFBAOKwSuVkov6BZKmdVFT/7Zn4jjA1HvqhN+X4U1FnXWZy3fmzMFj YmCOv9lYeBLiRzGiPw4v94PfQf1g3e90RFTd5fr6d1UY8hdfJLncHbVq8j8qsDQI rlWpn7QH2n6lVUDlj7cUA8HDtohPDAw3VDgdHMtOJTx1Dw99XSEefFlygkZncuX8 mIXYFBucCSgLk6qaUcg32ZZQhdVYtSikwgZozM/1UWpAHZcquaKRy6fMf8AnOkUa Zs1ksHc3WOoN2sg7eCLTMtHUz3SkYQ== =x7RH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----