From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Sat May 09 18:19:21 2026 Return-path: To: NOTsomeone at ..crosoft.invalid Subject: Re: Re: Is Zack Polanski Right? References: <10tn1h9$3i43s$5@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: <10tn1h9$3i43s$5@dont-email.me> Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [177832177811396] reject notnew Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 18:19:21 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too repetitive. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat May 09 11:16:18 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eternal-september.org > Authentication-Results: name/BD7C260358; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=microsoft.invalid > To: uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > From: GB > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Is Zack Polanski Right? > Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 11:16:10 +0100 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Message-ID: <10tn1h9$3i43s$5@dont-email.me> > References: > > > > > > > > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Injection-Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 10:16:10 +0000 (UTC) > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y+qcv9eMwQi1WDoS1AY/4dQBNrM= sha256:B3iczjfYvDd+dYfZMAVbAF3/tMPupNX0gwtCPRxFiGQ= sha1:Duv6rENM3p+4oX8UxHez49TDcgY= > Content-Language: en-GB > X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19AoXmnPNdQZEQgvC+gYVqtMM5uGt1QMPo= > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on smtp > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 58 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.8 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: Received: Received: Cancel-Lock: > > On 08/05/2026 22:10, Jeff Gaines wrote: > > On 08/05/2026 in message > > Mark Goodge wrote: > > > >> On 7 May 2026 08:46:39 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> My OP included: > >>> > >>> "Will we still have to pay for extra protection/policing of Jewish > >>> people > >>> to the exclusion of everybody else despite the fact the attack was not > >>> terrorism nor antisemitism as we now know?" > >> > >> The answer to that question is so clearly and obviously "no" that it's > >> hard > >> to take seriously anyone asking it. > >> > >> Mark > > > > It was an undertaking by Starmer. Are you saying it will be withdrawn > > since the perp hasn't been charged with any sort of antisemitic hate crime? > > > > > Do you believe that stating the same fallacy repeatedly makes it true? > Do you think you persuade anybody? > Do you think that people raise their opinion of you, or lower it, the > more you repeat it? > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmn/bJkACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x5M6Af/T+wTVnKgPJh4/uO7N3ZDqGmfI5vByCnU8G9oUwxcExsAc5iUmiPWk6ZM 4YMHNltfhORRGtPsWOe7Udwx9Zhe5dkbNnu4EvSv3CCYocPLmOsVZhmGvLSj6q4j f69oIH1nuxUHbe/6CYldY0TiWpPWVbvFHKjo6wseGsi8f8kTzOaaTvPSVc5nHKZ0 Zjhs2nlm8yIQKJzF430N0YWaMO/cSgVWxHkwsST+pr5rYJQbCe/3qUYcS2Zk79Lq lQsilUnS6OS4GSWD+ymBoppQY8eTu9S76AjBf+D3NaGK291bvOGHVVlxoVqhxwxS RSgjg5+19EyD118ZJRIGfhUFkYqZzQ== =P5ot -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----