From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Fri May 08 01:05:56 2026 Return-path: To: jgnewsid at ..tlook.com Subject: Re: Re: Is Zack Polanski Right? References: <10t7h9d$2tah5$1@dont-email.me> <10t9s7u$3iqiv$1@dont-email.me> <10td5ma$hu5f$2@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [1778188082709] reject repetition Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 01:05:56 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post repeats a recent post or a recent query without appearing to add anything new. You could try to discuss the topic from a different angle or wait a few weeks until it seems right to bring up this subject again. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Thu May 07 22:08:02 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uni-berlin.de; dkim=pass header.d=uni-berlin.de header.s=fub01 header.a=rsa-sha256 > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:From:Reply-To:Subject :Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=EFoHhJGFxlvHHLz70nI7Ep2r76PbgRJDj2yGy2UTDGE=; t=1778188076; x=1778792876; b=EQBnl9vhDWG3EZjiY9ltDEsl1esSIg3FYbeLbE/fFHa+jxJn4h7OnuEqdeF+bKdOJ/PQob1kor0 vhRl2wKufUoR > From: "Jeff Gaines" > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Is Zack Polanski Right? > Date: 7 May 2026 21:07:55 GMT > Message-ID: > References: <10t7h9d$2tah5$1@dont-email.me> <10t9s7u$3iqiv$1@dont-email.me> <10td5ma$hu5f$2@dont-email.me> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net Wc8sflgiCdtkKILV4WCxHwwvRVOnmeNMTjb1EV2rLdc3BkvZIG > Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fm4DcTteLJPLaCHVbg04SqFvdnY= sha256:leuxF4M+7JsP3Q45FfrhVMYZp8NCNFo1w/+6wW7hvCA= > User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell) > X-Face: `{n`"d>nF^Uwzc:,L`j,x > X-Ref: news.individual.net ~XNS:0000612B > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 39 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.9 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 07/05/2026 in message JNugent wrote: > > >On 07/05/2026 11:09 AM, Jeff Gaines wrote: > > > >>JNugent wrote: > >>>Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>>>Jon Ribbens wrote: > >>>>>Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>>>>>JNugent wrote: > >>>>>>>Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>>>You must have missed the report that £25 million is being paid to > >>>>>>>>Jewish communities for extra policing because of the antisemitic > >>>>>>>>attack in Golders Green presumably (which we now know were nothing > >>>>>>>>to do with antisemitism or terrorism)? Starmer made the > >>>>>>>>announcement. > >>> > >>>>>>>"...paid TO Jewish communitie...s"? > >>>>>>>How? And in what form? > >>>>>>>As compensation for past failures of policing? > >>>>>>>It doesn't sound too likely, does it? > >>> > >>>>>>If you want to be pedantic it's paid to the police EXCLUSIVELY to > >>>>>>provide additional policing for Jewish communities. Am I the only > >>>>>>one who has kept up with the various announcements on this matter? > >>> > >[JR:] > >>>>>It seems more like you're the only one who hasn't been keeping up. > >>> > >[JG:} > >>>>Then why did I have to explain this payment that has been widely > >>>>reported since the day of the attack? > >>> > >[JN:] > >>> > >>>Here's a hint: You didn't have to explain anything which was not a > >>>result of your own error (if error it was). > >> > >>You need to explain that. As I said earlier: > >> > >>My OP included: > >> > >>"Will we still have to pay for extra protection/policing of Jewish > >>people to the exclusion of everybody else despite the fact the attack > >>was not terrorism nor antisemitism as we now know?" > >> > >>That is not wrong and hasn't changed. > > > >Where to begin...? > > > >You said that the money was going to Jewish communities and behaved... > >well... boorishly... when it was pointed out to you (by several posters) > >that you could not be more wrong. > > > >As to your latest claim that addressing threat and crime is all wrong > >because it will mean less protection for people not suffering the > >threats... > > > >...is it really necessary to point out that this applies to ALL crime? Any > >officers dealing with one thing are, by definition, at least temporarily > >unable to deal with other crime reports from other places? > > > >Come on... > > Starmer said: > > "A further £25 million will be invested to increase security for Jewish > communities after the suspected terror attack in north London, the > Government has said." > > Here's one report, there are dozens of others: > > https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/national/26065594.government-announces-gbp25m-security-golders-green-attack/ > > -- > Jeff Gaines Dorset UK > This is as bad as it can get, but don't bet on it > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmn9KOQACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x7ZcQgAvvvtXH8Cry1KrrnVnm+ojWWDhIxu0LudIZaxrKPvTjCgEL8yEGpR1Qzt vNtCxt6QE4qzDS7FgXSfM8/G/AE56AAvlKz0hZWc1HO2MJ55rhMhsca0u+kRGEpU pPxTzxTq4m5Gs7haIdfRGh0Mse3XbamLB7q9THtIO7E5fNXvWPzkOHZtYI9SIcog w6wAaiz9SQJxiJKVo4eCl14rBUf4l2XLx8gE9J3PtQDRXX1h9/eBb+h6m5/TCh9+ psIrMfEd/yZx2eLnUSzlUhGGzY7QjrayvjHrxvvpRH1RBPZdRaPrhapc/ZyGX31d y8v+YvN1TACDqcLU0CQdUxkYIaBPVQ== =CzSU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----