From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Fri May 08 01:05:44 2026 Return-path: To: jgnewsid at ..tlook.com Subject: Re: Re: Is Zack Polanski Right? References: <10t7h9d$2tah5$1@dont-email.me> <10t9s7u$3iqiv$1@dont-email.me> <10td5ma$hu5f$2@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [177818792326565] reject repetition Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 01:05:44 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post repeats a recent post or a recent query without appearing to add anything new. You could try to discuss the topic from a different angle or wait a few weeks until it seems right to bring up this subject again. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Thu May 07 22:05:23 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uni-berlin.de; dkim=pass header.d=uni-berlin.de header.s=fub01 header.a=rsa-sha256 > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:From:Reply-To:Subject :Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=WqaMbcpAqpyrrhu2eEXzhUvgM22xXanRXiFMLY6CZ5s=; t=1778187917; x=1778792717; b=L06edg7ARzraRldoWyObbRlFPo0lYUESdooy2X2qjXtF2FDvHraCOnlOCXZxcL7CbuUh9CpJc/X NZOFiXbVmXmQ > From: "Jeff Gaines" > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Is Zack Polanski Right? > Date: 7 May 2026 21:05:15 GMT > Message-ID: > References: <10t7h9d$2tah5$1@dont-email.me> <10t9s7u$3iqiv$1@dont-email.me> <10td5ma$hu5f$2@dont-email.me> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net /YGw0q7Y4X2JLvHkFA/wxg/c8npk/75PHFAPLCs5xhvffSu6HP > Cancel-Lock: sha1:lGrBEggaJk+P98PJUFtm+OR8q48= sha256:cUwSHAPd0f+wO/ItlJz086AA1g+agpPaj3pJCTJbUAY= > User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell) > X-Face: `{n`"d>nF^Uwzc:,L`j,x > X-Ref: news.individual.net ~XNS:0000612A > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 39 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.9 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 07/05/2026 in message > Jon Ribbens wrote: > > >On 2026-05-07, Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>On 06/05/2026 in message > >>Jon Ribbens wrote: > >>>On 2026-05-06, Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>>>On 06/05/2026 in message > >>>> > >>>>Jon Ribbens wrote: > >>>>>On 2026-05-06, Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>>>>>On 06/05/2026 in message JNugent > >>>>>>wrote: > >>>>>>>On 05/05/2026 10:24 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote: > >>>>>>>>You must have missed the report that £25 million is being paid to > >>>>>>>>Jewish communities for extra policing because of the antisemitic > >>>>>>>>attack > >>>>>>>>in Golders Green presumably (which we now know were nothing to do > >>>>>>>>with > >>>>>>>>antisemitism or terrorism)? Starmer made the announcement. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>"...paid TO Jewish communitie...s"? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>How? And in what form? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>As compensation for past failures of policing? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>It doesn't sound too likely, does it? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>If you want to be pedantic it's paid to the police EXCLUSIVELY to > >>>>>>provide > >>>>>>additional policing for Jewish communities. Am I the only one who has > >>>>>>kept > >>>>>>up with the various announcements on this matter? > >>>>> > >>>>>It seems more like you're the only one who hasn't been keeping up. > >>>> > >>>>Then why did I have to explain this payment that has been widely > >>>>reported > >>>>since the day of the attack? > >>> > >>>You didn't have to explain it. In fact you failed to explain it, > >>>you got it wrong, and you had to have other people explain it to you. > >> > >>Did you reply to the right person? > > > >Yes. > > OK you missed this: > > "Will we still have to pay for extra protection/policing of Jewish people > to the exclusion of everybody else despite the fact the attack was not > terrorism nor antisemitism as we now know?" > > That is not wrong and hasn't changed. > > If you believe any of it has been corrected with facts please let me know. > > -- > Jeff Gaines Dorset UK > That's an amazing invention but who would ever want to use one of them? > (President Hayes speaking to Alexander Graham Bell on the invention of the > telephone) > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmn9KNgACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x5hXAf+Nh+nL6bo2IL6Xt1qwI8yqjewuTa4998K9ZNaL7wGqlrUgdUrPGw6LPPp 2H3HC+r8CXEAorgJ23vDu3JUovQuMxJ1vB63F1QtVhIhuieCISx4YOJvvm+g+sk9 J6flz36I4StsRrPksOLnGIdUA3NMuAxjECAq8PQdDBlSD4qSRV40+EUhWejk9aAv tLlfJH6GlH8/gVKvIVrzFmmFkv4IBqGgbIvkeaU+7MlZ3q2XCX9MCXMgayAI4tCW smN3wGFmhSIugIfMxcdIPA6PFSpXUTxpyPue0LDY4qiFSm9KlulEOI99h4tDEnL/ P//nZZFECzeKyyi1d/p1nAXqWqvrLg== =2NQC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----