From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Sat Jan 03 15:59:40 2026 Return-path: To: JNugent73 at ..il.com Subject: Re: Re: Post Office. Another smoking gun References: <10j0dnk$1ojq4$1@dont-email.me> <10j0me8$258oe$1@dont-email.me> <10j10as$1udcq$1@dont-email.me> <10j3sls$2q8m1$1@dont-email.me> <10j5pl7$3fla9$1@dont-email.me> <10j8n6l$g3hq$1@dont-email.me> <10jat3m$73to$7@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [176744133320664] reject offtopic Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2026 15:59:40 +0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.legal.moderated or has insufficient law-related material. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat Jan 03 11:55:33 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uni-berlin.de; dkim=pass header.d=uni-berlin.de header.s=fub01 header.a=rsa-sha256 > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:From: Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To: References; bh=ruew70mXFIBA4igZPtqS+D5L+fC86KrdUGFhBZO4UHs=; t=1767441327; x=1768046127; b=gOouQA66O0jU+5A0WgrzCv+gjr2DDIgNajVR+r1CyRpXWEk1s8PI2jTpcs5Bv YIiVXeCU22qpd0 > From: JNugent > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Post Office. Another smoking gun > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 11:55:25 +0000 > Organization: Home User > Message-ID: > References: <10j0dnk$1ojq4$1@dont-email.me> <10j0me8$258oe$1@dont-email.me> > <10j10as$1udcq$1@dont-email.me> <10j3sls$2q8m1$1@dont-email.me> > <10j5pl7$3fla9$1@dont-email.me> <10j8n6l$g3hq$1@dont-email.me> > <10jat3m$73to$7@dont-email.me> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net bI6CdwO+QzfSqz2fucgKmgFXwWiwPIykFo+Gmrc1nF4iX5mFvC > Cancel-Lock: sha1:VFCPGRjR3Vt/8avwhZ2NQM1tu2k= sha256:MtU1H6BLkrk5c0wDIMbyQmfgJsJeDW/v+U9ULvdWkf8= > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Content-Language: en-US > X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 260103-0, 1/3/2026), Outbound message > X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 68 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.8 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 03/01/2026 11:04 am, Jethro_uk wrote: > > > On Sat, 03 Jan 2026 10:26:28 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: > >> Pancho remarked: > >> > >>> I'm trying to make the point Vennels was a normal person, doing normal > >>> things. The justice system should be configured to handle her behaviour. > >>> There should have been rules in place to check what the PO did and > >>> mitigate for the problems of normal human behaviour. There is little > >>> point in scapegoating individuals when there is a systemic problem. > >> > >> What I find extremely difficult to believe is her claim that she didn't > >> know the PO was conducting private prosecutions, and hence relied upon > >> the good offices of the CPS to make sure all prosecutions were kosher. > > > > Yet another example of someone whose job is to be responsible for an > > opganisation (remember that's why the salary is so high) who is allowed > > to get away with saying "nothing to do with me guv" when the shit hits > > the fan. > > > > What *exactly* is a CEO responsible for ? > > Or, for that matter, a Director of Public Prosecutions? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmlZPOwACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x5+uAf/cnoc9sdqn3HmtJXd2ZGbOld0deGqM9U6of1dn6C7w5FIkh1b2LOCSkZU IkP2aumxnet2vBQo5xeW9m/yvZ7UvuFOZNcxW6habYCDAWa52CO8I004VB54QZCP LAWC+gQHsigLF/GP9qhrQ91TxF8lnSzokIj759EB3z1cztNxOhFwKk94OaYC7BBG jJ+dTNxKzCIb/6Bo+cgxzRFRooov5tUokN/AIRd5l73mujs6eXFkD8pYQ9o2kJ8H EoKt5W/85BLrrDd7x6/xNWjrk50iPTDN4Z4o3jBLO74bUOH0t1EXXK+qhu8IxpGI K4DzxEwqmIZM1xrdE1/Ko0JbRygq6w== =7HGL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----