From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Sat Jan 03 15:58:46 2026 Return-path: To: JNugent73 at ..il.com Subject: Re: Re: General Election Timing References: <1043331947.d1da0e1c@uninhabited.net> <5964511251.a9043d6f@uninhabited.net> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [17674409717463] reject notnew Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2026 15:58:46 +0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too repetitive. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat Jan 03 11:49:31 2026 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uni-berlin.de; dkim=pass header.d=uni-berlin.de header.s=fub01 header.a=rsa-sha256 > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:From: Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To: References; bh=QQLscOpzrYES+ZHibRgEyjA5hJ/eRsWQEWoNX4IUypE=; t=1767440965; x=1768045765; b=KALvTO89pXdLM4eFVoROorqnGysOQhjgQor0aah2Kq2fYtpA6K2yQpSDuWBX8 3cycxGG7Clo1cE > From: JNugent > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: General Election Timing > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 11:49:23 +0000 > Organization: Home User > Message-ID: > References: > <1043331947.d1da0e1c@uninhabited.net> > <5964511251.a9043d6f@uninhabited.net> > > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net lGoX+PDp0kHous3uNw+0TAey8gEcb1NCFLT0hmF8KdRYl2gjr/ > Cancel-Lock: sha1:7xBLSYIwq8LD1tY5n+Xx4ajI990= sha256:Ru+V5Y6waQ/FSL093iTLG+6HkCJtJuIF4rpucdc8FeE= > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Content-Language: en-US > X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 260103-0, 1/3/2026), Outbound message > X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 68 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.8 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 02/01/2026 09:10 pm, Jeff Gaines wrote: > > On 02/01/2026 in message JNugent wrote: > > > >>> It confirms that what the PC said was inept and inappropriate. But > >>> that does > >>> not mean his actions were unreasonable and illogical. He expressed > >>> himself > >>> wrongly. And this should have been, and was, apologised for. But the > >>> man he > >>> stopped was a pro-Israeli campaigner, and that is actually why he was > >>> stopped. > >> > >> What is wrong with being pro-Israeli? > >> > >> Is it an offence under the regime of Der Stürmer? > >> > >> If it is, that's a surprise since the official policy of the United > >> Nations (including the United Kingdom), ever since the later 1940s, > >> has been to be pro-Israel. So what's wrong with it? Was the gentleman > >> concerned not entitled to be pro-Israel or something? > >> > >>>  After all, a significant minority of the pro-Palestine marchers "looked > >>> Jewish" as they had banners saying so; and the unfortunate PC was not > >>> trying > >>> to exclude them. > >> > >> "Openly Jewish" was the phrase used. It meant that he was wearing a > >> skullcap. > >> > >> When was that made an offence? > > > > As has been pointed out many times he was deliberately trying to provoke > > a march in support of Palestinians and was stopped by police to prevent > > a breach of the peace and for his own protection. > > Prove it. > > > Thee police may have > > been clumsy in saying it and he and his organisation are milking it for > > all its worth. I am pretty sure he was an official of the CAMPAIGN > > AGAINST ANTISEMITISM > > Even if true, so what? > > > (CAA is a volunteer-led charity dedicated to exposing and countering > > antisemitism through education and zero-tolerance enforcement of the > > law). so his motive is clear. > > Yes. He is against antisemitism. > > Aren't you? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEyBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmlZPLYACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x686Af2L1lnYEqid1pJ3Nowe7YeggN/W5i7yf4hHceKV6jZ10M3Imem5Kcyg42v M08TtKQe+c48wwrudwabGlFg1oI1diqDpukDzrsLv6tYbtn3/pEHKZI722T2tWvC pl7DKQbv4BgJ/2vply7DcSflV6CG2Qgfq69BilPJDfWHJ+ZjzyPas8QywkkCdKHR Sm0VXz1laR40XFeP6Y2YoPWVFIyvi8OYj/u1Y7vRMAp/97qDzGN/c0ljnZiRAXKR UIt8vKnN0s29mrb2curYe1UYCIzqeZv+kavIqYwAminGULhrpYTlyD0xmrER9lJK jPJQj4DX6Z9KJrnHgLuMq9pBsQ5C =yLKT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----