From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Sat May 17 14:25:13 2025 Return-path: To: fredxx at ..am.invalid Subject: Re: Re: Is Astrology a Religion? References: <1004kr9$33t72$1@dont-email.me> <1005feo$2k2cu$7@dont-email.me> <1007ak3$3ol85$1@dont-email.me> <1007lm6$3qtp9$2@dont-email.me> <100a0ef$d21b$1@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: <100a0ef$d21b$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [174748597218137] reject repetition Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 14:25:13 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post repeats a recent post or a recent query without appearing to add anything new. You could try to discuss the topic from a different angle or wait a few weeks until it seems right to bring up this subject again. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat May 17 13:46:12 2025 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Received-SPF: pass (mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com: domain of eternal-september.org designates 2a01:4f9:c010:ad8c::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a01:4f9:c010:ad8c::1; envelope-from=news@eternal-september.org; helo=smtp.eternal-september.org; > Authentication-Results: name/423E560A01; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=spam.invalid > To: uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > From: Fredxx > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Is Astrology a Religion? > Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 13:46:08 +0100 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Message-ID: <100a0ef$d21b$1@dont-email.me> > References: > > > > > > > <1004kr9$33t72$1@dont-email.me> > <1005feo$2k2cu$7@dont-email.me> > <1007ak3$3ol85$1@dont-email.me> > <1007lm6$3qtp9$2@dont-email.me> > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Injection-Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 14:46:08 +0200 (CEST) > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Cancel-Lock: sha1:HcgKvmHyPsYEdnMptPow5BcDOwY= > Content-Language: en-GB > X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19WtIpfQyD098vafldWODj45XKFVM7M8ZQ= > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on smtp.eternal-september.org > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 35 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: X-Spam-Checker-Version: > > On 17/05/2025 00:10, JNugent wrote: > > On 16/05/2025 04:30 PM, Fredxx wrote: > > > >> On 16/05/2025 15:53, JNugent wrote: > >>> On 16/05/2025 01:21 PM, Fredxx wrote: > >>>> On 16/05/2025 12:48, JNugent wrote: > >>>>> On 15/05/2025 08:31 PM, Jethro_uk wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, 15 May 2025 17:32:26 +0100, JNugent wrote: > >> > >>>>>>> ...and really seems to believe that a work of fiction written in the > >>>>>>> mid-1970s for a movie is a religion (unless he is adopting that > >>>>>>> stance merely for the sake of contrarianism). > >> > >>>>>> And the Bible isn't a collection of campfire tales ? > >> > >>>>> That is not the matter at issue and is an attempt at diversion. > >> > >>>> So you finally agree that all beliefs based on fiction should be > >>>> respected? > >> > >>> What *I* believe is not the matter under discussion. > >>> We were discussing factual matters - such as how anyone who claims to > >>> follow a "religion" based on undoubted fiction can be taken seriously > >>> (and, indeed, whether they even expect to be taken seriously). > >> > >> That is why I don't take you seriously. The only difference is you have > >> an expectation of being taken seriously when you shouldn't. > > > > If you don't take seriously the matters we have been discussing, one > > marvels that you have been so persistent. > > I very much take the matters we are discussing seriously. Your views can > be dismissed simply from your denial that the belief in an universal > "Force" is based on the long standing beliefs of Chi, Qi, Ki and Prana. > > Where your belief is made up of fiction and a god you don't know the > name of, your belief is entirely reliant on some books of made up > stories and plagiarism. I guess if you hear the same story multiple > times it must make it true. > > So far your response closely resembles narcissistic tendencies, where > other beliefs are wrong and shouldn't be respected and mine are right > and must be respected. > > So, do you deny the beliefs taken by George Lucas were already in > existence such as Chi, Qi, Ki and Prana? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmgojjkACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x4D/Qf/b/TyTsDG0NkiW/TmbYEwG3iDi+T8qiMdEvAm5x4cPFQK6hGdC94M/96H ohLIbwMSjSO4ISSy659Pqg24XgZdwFO27Eoy//X8YSqQoKV4ZfZtH8d20KrTu+8a 9l+zdHxjD7WU0txNW/48K6dYW/97vzBe63uX+F/hmFVRF4m91XaMSTECtH/0MpuO KykasxBV4NLhacorMHGFPS4THlqaqjqQYmzRxF7/YaHZzHuFA08z5n+y9gHSziTh JlpPQCeqYfXfu9ray1p6t9CyKjeNZWNy8pB7wDDC6pBj1X/39t0ZMW+xQbiJ/gXI 70fqjPAx+cXWRLdL95oOXey/rOel9Q== =qp7p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----