X-Git-Url: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~mdw/git/clg/blobdiff_plain/9c35ab2a65c1572aab7424ad6109fa98f412f7bb..72d9260f8258b525339c7241da0631ceaf9f3842:/gtk/gtktypes.lisp

diff --git a/gtk/gtktypes.lisp b/gtk/gtktypes.lisp
index 4a0a52e..2bd3f9b 100644
--- a/gtk/gtktypes.lisp
+++ b/gtk/gtktypes.lisp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 ;; TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE
 ;; SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
 
-;; $Id: gtktypes.lisp,v 1.64 2008-05-06 00:09:03 espen Exp $
+;; $Id: gtktypes.lisp,v 1.65 2008-10-27 18:42:01 espen Exp $
 
 (in-package "GTK")
 
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ (defclass border (boxed)
     :type int))
   (:metaclass boxed-class))
 
+(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+  (register-type 'border '|gtk_border_get_type|))
+
 (defclass stock-item (struct)
   ((id
     :allocation :alien
@@ -145,6 +148,11 @@ (define-type-method reader-function ((type position) &optional ref)
   (declare (ignore type ref))
   (reader-function 'int))
 
+;; Register GtkObject in advance so that eg GtkTooltips, which inherits from it,
+;; gets a proper supertype. TODO: This is a hack. Where is it supposed to
+;; happen?
+(register-type '%object "GtkObject")
+
 (define-types-by-introspection "Gtk"
   ;; Manually defined
   ("GtkObject" :ignore t)
@@ -154,6 +162,8 @@ (define-types-by-introspection "Gtk"
   ("GtkTreePath" :ignore t)
 ;  ("GtkStyle" :ignore t)
 
+  ("GtkMountOperation" :ignore t) ; Needs GIO
+
   ;; Manual override
   ("GtkWidget"
    :slots