From 53290ee39d0b4a61d75df3e7ef9372380352594e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:32:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] barrier: suppress false-positive warning

If poll() returns, one of both revents must be set, thus "buf" is set by
either clause. This is non-obvious for code-checkers so add an "else
continue;" clause to suppress "uninitialized variable" warnings.
---
 src/shared/barrier.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/shared/barrier.c b/src/shared/barrier.c
index 4ac42d023..4a5544de2 100644
--- a/src/shared/barrier.c
+++ b/src/shared/barrier.c
@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ static bool barrier_read(Barrier *b, int64_t comp) {
                          * guarantees that exit-abortions do not overwrite real
                          * barriers. */
                         buf = BARRIER_ABORTION;
+                else
+                        continue;
 
                 /* lock if they aborted */
                 if (buf >= (uint64_t)BARRIER_ABORTION) {
-- 
2.30.2