Provide "test-dummy" distro with "dummycat" access method.

[dgit.git] / dgit.1

diff --git a/dgit.1 b/dgit.1
index c261300f555bd92a3a5c53184edd66ed9a7f28bb..7e74d5b77f62fdfc2ad5782c3973e8b9b4907c62 100644 (file)
--- a/dgit.1
+++ b/dgit.1
@@ -361,13 +361,14 @@ filename suggests it is for the right package and version - or,
 if there is a _multi.changes file, dgit uses that.
 .TP
 .BI --existing-package= package
-dgit push needs to canonicalise the suite name.  But currently
-there is no way to ask the archive to do this without knowing the
+dgit push needs to canonicalise the suite name.  Sometimes, dgit
+lacks a way to ask the archive to do this without knowing the
 name of an existing package.  Without --new we can just use the
 package we are trying to push.  But with --new that will not work, so
 we guess
 .B dpkg
-or use the value of this option.
+or use the value of this option.  This option is not needed with the
+default mechanisms for accessing the archive.
 .TP
 .BR -h | --help
 Print a usage summary.
@@ -481,10 +482,11 @@ remote.  This refers to the well-known dgit-repos location
 (currently, the dgit-repos project on Alioth).  dgit fetch updates
 the remote tracking branch for dgit/suite.
 
-dgit does not (currently) represent the orig tarball(s) in git; nor
-does it represent the patch statck of a `3.0 (quilt)' package.  The
-orig tarballs are downloaded and kept in the parent directory, as with
-a traditional (non-gitish) dpkg-source workflow.
+dgit does not (currently) represent the orig tarball(s) in git.  The
+orig tarballs are downloaded (by dgit clone) into the parent
+directory, as with a traditional (non-gitish) dpkg-source workflow.
+You need to retain these tarballs in the parent directory for dgit
+build and dgit push.
 
 To a user looking at the archive, changes pushed using dgit look like
 changes made in an NMU: in a `3.0 (quilt)' package the delta from the
@@ -612,11 +614,11 @@ on the dgit command line.
 .TP
 .BI dgit-distro. distro .archive-query-default-component
 .TP
-.BI dgit-distro. distro .sshdakls-user
+.BI dgit-distro. distro .sshpsql-user
 .TP
-.BI dgit-distro. distro .sshdakls-host
+.BI dgit-distro. distro .sshpsql-host
 .TP
-.BI dgit-distro. distro .sshdakls-dir
+.BI dgit-distro. distro .sshpsql-dbname
 .TP
 .BI dgit-distro. distro .ssh
 .TP
@@ -645,20 +647,13 @@ We should be using some kind of vhost/vpath setup for the git repos on
 alioth, so that they can be moved later if and when this turns out to
 be a good idea.
 
-Debian Policy needs to be updated to describe the new Dgit .dsc
-field (and to specify that it is an RC bug for that field to refer
-to an unavailable commit).
-
-The method of canonicalising suite names is bizarre.  See the
-.B --existing-package
-option for one of the implications.
-
 dgit push should perhaps do `git push origin', or something similar,
 by default.
 
 Debian does not have a working rmadison server, so to find out what
 version of a package is in the archive, or to canonicalise suite
-names, we ssh directly into the ftpmaster server.
+names, we ssh directly into the ftpmaster server and run psql there to
+access the database.
 
 The mechanism for checking for and creating per-package repos on
 alioth is a hideous bodge.  One consequence is that dgit currently
@@ -698,16 +693,11 @@ There should be an option which arranges for the `3.0 (quilt)'
 autocommit to not appear on your HEAD, but instead only in the
 remote tracking suite branch.
 
-There should at the very least be some advice in the manpage about how
-to use dgit when the signing key is not available on the same machine
-as the build host.
-
 The option parser requires values to be cuddled to the option name.
 
-dgit assumes knowledge of the archive layout.  There appears to be no
-sane way to find the path in the archive pool of the .dsc for a
-particular suite.  I'm assured that the archive layout is a
-`well known algorithm' by now.
+dgit assumes knowledge of the archive database.  (The information dgit
+needs is not currently available via any public online service with a
+well-defined interface, let alone a secure one.)
 
 --dry-run does not always work properly, as not doing some of the git
 fetches may result in subsequent actions being different.  Doing a