* Don't use too generic mail ids. Closes: #355725
* pts/summary is actually used. Thanks, Holger Levsen. Closes: #387108
* clarify that one should append the NMU-diff to a bug. Closes: #394033
+ * more detailed instructions on binary package removals.
+ Closes: #356643
-- Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:55:44 -0700
<!ENTITY % dynamicdata SYSTEM "dynamic.ent" > %dynamicdata;
<!-- CVS revision of this document -->
- <!ENTITY cvs-rev "$Revision: 1.313 $">
+ <!ENTITY cvs-rev "$Revision: 1.314 $">
<!-- if you are translating this document, please notate the CVS
revision of the original developer's reference in cvs-en-rev -->
removed automatically after the package has been removed from
<em>unstable</em> and no package in <em>testing</em> depends on it.
<p>
-If you are simply restructuring a source package so that it no longer
-produces one or more binary packages, there is no need to explicitly ask
-for the packages that are no longer created to be removed. Such packages
-will be removed when the new package structure has been uploaded into
-<em>unstable</em> and when no package in <em>testing</em> depends on it.
+There is one exception when an explicit removal request is not necessary:
+If a (source or binary) package is an orphan, it will be removed
+semi-automatically.
+For a binary-package, this means if there is no longer any source package
+producing this binary package;
+if the binary package is just no longer produced on some architectures,
+a removal request is still necessary.
+For a source-package, this means that all binary packages it refers to
+have been taken over by another source package.
<p>
-You also have to detail the reasons justifying the request. This is to
+In your removal request, you have to detail the reasons justifying the request.
+This is to
avoid unwanted removals and to keep a trace of why a package has been
removed. For example, you can provide the name of the package that
supersedes the one to be removed.