From f8637246494c0136651af433d281ed392f8172a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:24:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] merge coherence use two implies in statement since equiv
 cannot represent haspatch and nothaspatch

---
 article.tex | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/article.tex b/article.tex
index 4b64118..f5cfd3d 100644
--- a/article.tex
+++ b/article.tex
@@ -645,7 +645,8 @@ So indeed $L \haspatch \p \land R \haspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$.
 
 \subsubsection{For (wlog) $X \not\haspatch \p, Y \haspatch \p$:}
 
-$C \haspatch \p \equiv M \nothaspatch \p$.
+$M \haspatch \p \implies C \nothaspatch \p$.
+$M \nothaspatch \p \implies C \haspatch \p$.
 
 \proofstarts
 
-- 
2.30.2