From c8e61caa38b62fea5fefd7efa90996915ce3d70e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: cjwatson <>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:22:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] debhelper statistics

---
 debian/2010-03-03-debhelper-statistics.txt | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 debian/2010-03-03-debhelper-statistics.txt

diff --git a/debian/2010-03-03-debhelper-statistics.txt b/debian/2010-03-03-debhelper-statistics.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..92633647
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/2010-03-03-debhelper-statistics.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+debhelper statistics
+
+<p>I don't know if anyone else has been tracking this recently, but a while back I got curious about the relative proportions of dh(1) and CDBS in the archive, and started running some daily analysis on the Lintian lab.  Apologies for my poor graphing abilities, but the graph is here (occasionally updated):</p>
+
+<p><img src="http://people.debian.org/~cjwatson/dhstats.png" /></p>
+
+<p>Although dh is still a bit behind CDBS, the steady upward trend is quite striking - it looks set to break 20% soon, up from under 13% in September - compared with CDBS which has been sitting within half a percentage point of 25% the whole time.</p>
+
+<p>Incidentally, was that an ftpmaster trying to sign his name in the graph over Christmas or something? :-)</p>
-- 
2.30.2