[Uram-rejections] 11.1 metre wind turbines now "permitted development". Mast workaround?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 And a reference to a dispute elsewhere



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Mon Jan 29 11:45:42 2018
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> References: <1058155850.538295504.507790.usenet-stephenthomascole.com at news.individual.net> <265k6d1f5078cd2pm28qaao3pvngrb0mee at 4ax.com> <p4krf9$f3b$1 at dont-email.me> <SLobC.514214$9X4.3988 at fx02.am4> <p4l6tf$j0p$1 at dont-email.me> <p4mimb$1747$1 at gioia.aioe.org>
> Subject: Re: 11.1 metre wind turbines now "permitted development". Mast workaround?
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> Message-ID: <DPDbC.1420362$OX.374244 at fx47.am4>
> X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:45:39 UTC
> Organization: virginmedia.com
> Bytes: 2132
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:45:41 -0000
> 
> 
> "Jeff" <jeff at ukra.com> wrote in message news:p4mimb$1747$1 at gioia.aioe.org...
> > On 28/01/2018 19:05, Brian Reay wrote:
> >> On 28/01/2018 18:37, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> >>> "Brian Reay" <no.sp at m.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:p4krf9$f3b$1 at dont-email.me...
> >>>> On 25/01/2018 17:33, Guy G4DWV 4X1LT wrote:
> >>>>> On 22 Jan 2018 06:37:12 GMT, just as I was about to take a herb,
> >>>>> Stephen Thomas Cole <usenet at stephenthomascole.com> disturbed my
> >>>>> reverie and wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Where there's a will (and a wind turbine), there's a way!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Americans use their flag poles to similarly good effect. IIRC,
> >>>>> there is hardly any limit on the height of flagpoles in the
> >>>>> (patriotic) USA.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No reason we can't do the same. Flag poles for national flags don't 
> >>>> need
> >>>> planning permission.
> >>>
> >>> what about the pirate flag? .....
> >>>
> >>
> >> I specifically said national flags for a reason. Others need permission.
> >
> > Some flags other than national flags do not require permission; if you 
> > could convince the LA that the jolly roger was your "house flag" then you 
> > could get away with it!!
> >
> > Jeff
> 
> which is the house flag of every FL .... you could always fly a Mercedes 
> umbrella........ 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJabxh2AAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeDbQH/i/qsWsWzA5E1klmvQFno5Bi
1IzzGh1fgfpEUcCS+wZveCwlOTFDBUgQTLYleGm7ktHEBJrG4mCtp0m+smQXl0uE
ZfuGNfWG/X1Lq6HsU6o75uIB2fdhz+Yz6WMOxNWMWrM7RefKBK3Gj0MocPCHvOO/
N5+vgTKtHS23JBqEacquDB9QwawPVRQuZq93d6gB6hkU+5GhWiSeEsYB8sxIs05g
utGI6xJaB1eFFDmPeaejhFDYdbC/R0PWk2bs2GznBcjbQ8Kfr0gfiiG6CA6z9l5Q
6LOrblnPdQGMy8tpDb+cxsHW/g+8OpYVfvLY4V8CLWceLjL7wAUVZTTzOd0M08k=
=AoKS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----