[Uram-rejections] Young licence holders - what's your opinion?

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 You've not added much new to the discussion - can you expand it ?



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been
made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too
repetitive.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue May 02 09:22:06 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Burt Evans <invalid at mail.invalid>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Young licence holders - what's your opinion?
> Date: 2 May 2017 08:21:47 GMT
> Message-ID: <emqtsrFmen6U1 at mid.individual.net>
> References: <J4wWLrBtbmBZFwV+ at brattleho.plus.com>
> 	<memo.20170501103723.3612K at postmaster.cix.co.uk>
> 	<wfuoiMFWrwBZFwwk at brattleho.plus.com> <oe7lrj$dhd$1 at dont-email.me>
> 	<c2kzIqC8+4BZFwXw at brattleho.plus.com> <oe86ll$bpq$1 at dont-email.me>
> 	<b1fC4MHQg6BZFw2x at brattleho.plus.com> <oe986g$ple$1 at dont-email.me>
> X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net ic5Lda/zObYwFsAgzHrdlwBQLmqFuxcPtyFkdaZORyfvR8+MbE
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:emeYEGCNVGty0gfZtMDBe56+hyE=
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/45.3.0
> X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.6
> X-ZEDAT-Hint: R
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 359694
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 5908419e.d696-44c-8
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-8.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> On Tue, 02 May 2017 07:19:05 +0100, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
> 
> > "Ian Jackson" <ianREMOVETHISjackson at g3ohx.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:b1fC4MHQg6BZFw2x at brattleho.plus.com...
> >> In message <oe86ll$bpq$1 at dont-email.me>, Gareth's Downstairs Computer
> >> <headstone255.but.not.these.five.words at yahoo.com> writes
> >>>On 01/05/2017 20:42, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I always thought that serious QRP was a specialist pursuit, usually
> >>>> using scaled-down, simple equipment, ...
> >>>
> >>>... but at the time of your licence being issued, were you not limited
> >>>to 10W and CW for the first year?
> >>
> >> No. That ended in, I believe, the mid 50s. It was certainly long gone
> >> by 1960.
> >>>
> >>>
> > that was the start of the decline of the hobby ...
> 
> 
> No, the start of the decline was with the scrapping of the artificial 
> aerial licence.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZCE98AAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Me7osIAIJNbIlZkSkzCAji9F39eO+/
TvJ557+mumg9sOm71Q2jZc9Kr71pwgMLFoz8BjuhJwDrnBqzEBLbofEB5bANjIfy
X0BLqiaikuU5pFEQJWvys5RmpS8/z81FQrFjkU/NAK9fX/Wl859aWS+kL15o/CaU
YmE1mERdEiY8InvdsqQUkhnNohkVnSsfjuq/OXOcUfzaSRqlLCyW/4klr6IqqV3z
me9wdFhBkQs6VcCORZGECGr4ANMnqPjenub4h+CbyBup5mpvUq8OLhDT80nLm8rd
fIw4YBPircF4iDBQhWF44NEPp+6awL39A81mVIhuzZspWSEuZ4Fqf80bjDZqUqw=
=j2Rb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----