[Uram-rejections] Do most UK amateurs think this?

Thu Jul 20 06:04:14 BST 2017

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.radio.amateur.moderated
or has insufficient material related to amateur radio.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Jul 19 20:47:44 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at moderators.isc.org
> From: roger at hayter.org (Roger Hayter)
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Do most UK amateurs think this?
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:44:57 +0100
> Organization: Metazoon
> Message-ID: <1n9ffzo.uia1jy11u4ghkN%roger at hayter.org>
> References: <okluou$uv4$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <51aumc9t0jrcvi4o4qekbml3u1qge8l6lc at 4ax.com> <oknnkr$f6h$2 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
> User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.4 (6da4d6e6d0) (Mac OS X version 10.11.6 (x86))
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 10723958
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 596fb6bf.1062b-6c21-6
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-6.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> X-Warning: 195.74.61.92 is listed at dnsbl.sorbs.net
> 
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 7/19/2017 5:48 AM, Anthony R. Gold wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:36:56 -0400, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Just a question for those in the UK:
> > >>
> > >> In a blog at
> > >> http://sheffieldwireless.org/2017/07/getting-registered-on-dstar/, the
> > >> author says:
> > >>
> > >> "One more use for Terminal IDs (not IP addresses) is applicable in the
> > >> USA and perhaps other countries, where family members are permitted to
> > >> use the licensees radios to communicate with the licensee."
> > >>
> > >> Which is totally wrong - a licensed operator must always be in control
> > >> of the station when transmitting.  I'm just wondering if this is just
> > >> the author's opinion, or do many of the UK hams believe this?
> > > 
> > > https://xkcd.com/386/
> > > 
> > > Anyway I doubt many UK hams hold any kinds of firm beliefs about FCC
> > > regulation of the Amateur Radio Service, whether true or false.
> > > 
> > 
> > I wouldn't say that, from what I've read on usenet.  Some seem to think
> > they know more about the U.S. regs than the FCC does.
> 
> Usenet does seem to attract some very dogmatic people who believe they
> know everything and do not suffer from any self-doubt.   But I tend to
> agree, most of us would probably admit to having very little idea about
> American rules.  My vague ideas include the US having the right to carry
> third party traffic long before we did, and using higher power.  I had a
> vague impression you were forbidden to talk to amateurs in some
> countries, but I may be completely wrong about that!
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > But this is so extremely off base, I just had to ask.
> 
> Thanks for letting us know.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Roger Hayter
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZcDnOAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MedeAH/i0ebX4al/uqy14fSPXo3UEx
CEM62NWTO8bmdnPZ7S8hzAnWsW4uYXVFdgZ9u1BOFB2AjRtiQYlBcsRtLK5ZIbzk
ZgwC0xpGPgo/X+KLao1jduC/zNIvKO8odkj5MFT4HXmaWoD69LTOHzcS+B6GaZYh
J44onwt2z31G0i0iv1U9Z2oNxd+ELwK8LAOvYfspDxjcsdT4azkB2N2R3DLeVvJn
RKNXXkbPt3ixPQETXcmkJjbatGybi97/qRsK1o5CDa7UTRzOB/bA1czpnFf++GQp
vfQwldvAIprZgEv8GJ0rCFaLTRPoynIuD1Dk/mJg1eCtnTUzPfoMR6qSurG95MM=
=hmxA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----