[Uram-rejections] Revalidating Online

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Need more than that 



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been
made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too
repetitive.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Sun Jan 01 19:24:04 2017
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Revalidating Online
> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:23:37 -0000
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <o4bkt0$qqk$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <o3bf72$rqk$1 at dont-email.me> <o3bkkp$h7h$1 at dont-email.me> <JgStR2AcuuWYFwJD at g8bur.demon.co.uk> <o3g3gl$leg$1 at dont-email.me> <4u2p5cdan5ji63a157bfo7939emgqm702f at 4ax.com> <3Nwy66AuTjYYFwN1 at g8bur.demon.co.uk> <o3uh1f$vrl$1 at dont-email.me> <uDiUZWBmRtYYFwu1 at g8bur.demon.co.uk> <o3v41k$ui7$1 at dont-email.me> <o403ab$1oq3$2 at gioia.aioe.org> <o40hec$cr2$1 at dont-email.me> <o45p8q$stj$1 at dont-email.me> <o466ak$i61$1 at dont-email.me> <BG3EudKqarZYFwjf at b-howie.demon.co.uk> <Vpo8V$BKyuZYFwzM at g3ohx.co.uk> <o483oe$fdf$1 at gioia.aioe.org> <PsOq0WCTS7ZYFwhK at g3ohx.co.uk> <o48q62$n8v$1 at dont-email.me> <f1L+iHJJ2AaYFwKO at g3ohx.co.uk> <o4ato9$4ve$1 at dont-email.me> <i0UhSkI0TRaYFw97 at g3ohx.co.uk> <o4bff6$6b2$1 at dont-email.me>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Priority: 3
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19O7XAyvkW54zF19H54bP96aMLaTmyvXiA=
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:Th+subUVVuBBnmCRssLyMaKKrk8=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 42888813
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 5869573e.65c3-19d4-5
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-5.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> 
> "Peter Able" <stuck at home.com> wrote in message 
> news:o4bff6$6b2$1 at dont-email.me...
> >
> > "Ian Jackson" <ianTAKETHISOUTjackson at g3ohx.co.uk> wrote in message 
> > news:i0UhSkI0TRaYFw97 at g3ohx.co.uk...
> >> In message <o4ato9$4ve$1 at dont-email.me>, Jim GM4DHJ ...
> >> <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> writes
> >>>
> >>>"Ian Jackson" <ianTAKETHISOUTjackson at g3ohx.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>>news:f1L+iHJJ2AaYFwKO at g3ohx.co.uk...
> >>>> In message <o48q62$n8v$1 at dont-email.me>, Jim GM4DHJ ...
> >>>> <kinvig.netta at ntlworld.com> writes
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Like I said.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When I was first licensed (1960), the fixed station licence cost £4, 
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> the mobile £1 - and, of course, you couldn't have a mobile licence
> >>>>>> unless you had a fixed station licence.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If you had an amateur mobile licence you didn't need a car radio 
> >>>>>licence
> >>>>
> >>>> No so, Jim.
> >>>>
> >>>> Amateur licences had/have nothing to do with broadcast receiving
> >>>> licences. On the other hand, I recall a time when the broadcast
> >>>> receiving licence (both radio and TV/radio) specifically included
> >>>> reception of amateur radio stations - which, with a few rare 
> >>>> exceptions,
> >>>> are not broadcasting stations.
> >>>>>.....
> >>>naw sorry wrong there Ian you didn't need a car radio broadcast lic if 
> >>>you
> >>>had an amateur lic in the 60's.
> >>
> >> Well, I might be wrong - but I don't recall any UK amateur radio licence
> >> mentioning reception of broadcast radio.
> >>
> >>>....sorry to be personal but did you ever
> >>>read your mobile licence? ....
> >>>
> >> If you're right - obviously not!
> >>
> >
> >>From HQ 187/65 CVB, Note m:
> >
> > "For the reception of broadcast programmes a separate broadcast receiving 
> > Licence is necessary."
> >
> > PA
> >
> >
> I don't believe that ..... 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYah3iAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeHz0H/AlckbueNdhasEivI3Ri+DnE
yOU/xWvckPYNScmFdFKb6qoBjC7CD1cADpmJDC+FyctylILX4bLr+wEbRjLeFHXG
bOqEgiDH8RTHIq94Fmu+pOv32NWBkvoKd1DXT+uwx+MiCFyHkeiNTajExmZ/ONBM
sBOVw1gaCGjfOcN5+EgSSWIlVnypQT2Hv5Q16ZHK7gVCX51oHrhysWW+BPiT19PG
UHrWdVSS+SP+ngHGrhwFXIVgZ/F3Ut6MssNYuEyBhOzkImkLz9rnR13qvOdX1boh
uXPLX1fNynjoiBpB4BDezlvChlpHKEoFKfwDVK4FoNmODO0yEvby+8FUcJx0gsI=
=tUm3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----