[Uram-rejections] G2DQU SK

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Sep 2 13:45:48 BST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 Sorry, the sig. is unacceptable



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Fri Sep 02 12:50:35 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Brian Reay <no.sp at m.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: G2DQU SK
> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:50:25 -0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <nqbp20$rjk$1 at dont-email.me>
> References: <nq1rlh$aoi$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <memo.20160829193328.160A at postmaster.cix.co.uk>
>  <nq3fsa$nl8$2 at gioia.aioe.org>
>  <nq4klr$99e$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <W4ydnSb9yuyNI1vKnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d at giganews.com>
>  <nq6vlg$a8i$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <nq8tll$1uc$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <nq9t7o$grs$1 at dont-email.me>
>  <nqbbej$os8$1 at gioia.aioe.org>
> User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.8 (iPad)
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/L3sfNDQIPeH9K23CPFMu4y+2jcAYhMOE=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:iEnp0alKKkt4g7UWeJijKkVfIa0=
> 	sha1:KDqGiCr/+ncD/9lLSmcdP+n9wmk=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 26409942
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 57c96785.12df7-63d8-4
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-4.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> Jeff <jeff at ukra.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> OFCOM funding doesn't work like that. No matter what the license fee,
> >> not a penny would go to OFCOM. It is simply buying, or not as things
> >> are, a 'bargaining' position.
> >> 
> >> Not a penny of any licence fee goes to OFCOM but the look after some
> >> licence payers.
> >> 
> > 
> > Ofcom's accounts would seem to suggest the opposite.
> > 
> > Whilst not specifically detailed for Amateur Licences, Ofcom certainly 
> > retains the income from licensing in other sectors.
> > 
> > It is listed in teh accounts and they also make the statement:
> > 
> > "Ofcom raises its funds from the
> > following sources:
> > Sector stakeholder funding
> > Broadcast licence fees for:
> > • Television
> > • Radio
> > Administrative charges for:
> > • Electronic networks and services
> > and making available associated
> > facilities
> > • Postal services regulation"
> > 
> > Jeff
> > 
> 
> The funding comes from Parliament as a 'vote', the licence fees etc go to
> the treasury 'pot' which (of course) eventually finds its way to the 'vote'
> but so does every other bit of gov. income. This type of funding route is
> not unique, it is used for a number of pseudo independent gov. departments.
> It is, in a way, almost a private agency, providing a service for a fixed
> fee, the vote, to the government. In theory, it provides better cost
> control- they get a fixed fee (the vote) and have to provide the service.
> If it goes bad, the government can blame them, they are, pseudo
> independent. 
> 
> This, not the blame bit, was explained, at an Ofcom meeting when they were
> launched.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Suspect someone is claiming a benefit under false pretences? Incapacity
> Benefit or Personal Independence Payment when they don't need it? They are
> depriving those in real need!  https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXyXR8AAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeSkUH+waGGTCgmQ1rfgtjjtCJj/Lg
hFpIxuOFKxXfyBBdNQEqHpmmpRTxKPRU0RV3SeNNP7A6h5WpIz33RwU//N6XY2Y7
X5VVCbyBgaoGOJWLU3xox+ATo5JsXZy67pvHK8apC08Sr3YaFL11JDEuBPhTfDPy
uXOJoN/b+1Zo+iAHL3jBZTWrwTx1RZfgwkyNaOjB96W1iwPSTj/Qb1uz7iTcl4IH
tpSkFiKhz9ulUAkLIZr19lLVRbjp+O6850Jwn+ptGWcVyYvogH08PpQwz1yM6Ggq
9lydEIUbJt0ROIaujmrS22YI6IZe4dUGLURIhEvtj8HurTRPC41Ak+ugmQDStCI=
=+UG4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list