[Uram-rejections] REPOST: OBTAINING A UK FULL (RECIPROCAL) LICENCE VIA A SINGLE EXAM

Wed May 4 18:50:45 BST 2016

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 This bit of the thread is getting a bit heated. Jerry's post was admittedly a little bit provoactive. If you can tone down the reply a bit ? Tnx

The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed May 04 18:47:55 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: "Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-mail at ahjg.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: REPOST: OBTAINING A UK FULL (RECIPROCAL) LICENCE VIA A SINGLE EXAM
> Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 13:46:35 -0400
> Organization: Microvest Limited, Key West FL
> Message-ID: <16dkibh5j4h8dovonr6n52l67p971pp9ej at 4ax.com>
> References: <ng4i6e$7nv$1 at dont-email.me> <qqrcib9pd8bc7b2jd2ken6si1tsc329cld at 4ax.com> <ng5sm8$3ub$1 at dont-email.me> <ng6a0j$1i8$2 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ng700l$1u2$10 at stc.eternal-september.org> <ng7clp$bi0$1 at dont-email.me> <ng7kjl$851$4 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <ng803p$obf$1 at dont-email.me> <ng82lj$427$1 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org> <fvohib9athoshfkvad5tce4018fpcsv9l9 at 4ax.com> <ngbiaq$g0u$3 at jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
> Reply-To: "Anthony R. Gold" <tgold at panix.com>
> X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net 4OYjmM1/0QRfqtKnWIXwbgvATDrT41jBgIk68fNa/YSsNDX7I=
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:HfQxcv9fVm9FPTLtCop3/DMijI8=
> X-No-Archive: yes
> X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.6
> X-ZEDAT-Hint: R
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 4023327
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 572a359c.8d70-9fe-7
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-7.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:16:27 -0400, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > On 5/3/2016 1:49 PM, Anthony R. Gold wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 May 2016 13:30:44 -0400, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex at attglobal.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The problem is, it's so easy to get a legally U.S. address even if you
> >>> don't live here, that requiring a U.S. address is pretty meaningless -
> >>> unless, maybe, they want to save the cost of overseas mail when they
> >>> send you the renewal reminder.
> >>
> >> You may find it meaningless however it still remains the law.
> >>
> >
> > Then show how one CAN'T get a U.S. mailing address, no matter where in
> > the world one lives.
> 
> What is your point and why must I prove anything for you to agree on what is
> black letter law? Or are you generally denying that the FCC regulates
> amateur radio licensing within its territories under the force of law?
> 
> Anyway it's here for you to check for yourself:
> 
> https://www.fcc.gov/general/rules-regulations-title-47 then you would need
> to drill down to Part 97 Subpart §97.23 - Mailing address.
> 
> > If it's not "meaningless", then that should be easy to prove.
> 
> Maybe I don't understand what you mean by meaningless. If you mean it is
> ineffective then perhaps you misunderstand the purpose of Subpart §97.23. It
> is not some kind of Tumpian wall to keep out "people like that" but simply
> required as a communications channel for administrative notices. So PO Boxes
> or an address of a friend or relative who will handle the mail are all fine.
> 
> (I posted this comment earlier from a new misconfigured machine. I don't
> know whether that post will appear with unusual headers or not at all.)
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXKjZ1AAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+Mev6sH/1DEpqsXHa08hq8gOk9EGZEJ
26r0F+005bUh8IW4o1nVhXxGEmE8mAaHVgL//8ppIEarp4DhoKZcpXtxYLbEh4Sn
PZjWZZoCneUnIfGD8Pe0wty/wmMyS6eEadJuZmD4rJJa4fPvWZAV7medfM1odmYy
nFxgSXhx0RjR2EeTtcAt61GvwbWrN5vL/cfuD1v7ZVzqMd67kNGnPsR513kxuhtj
pOUv44uSE/fpVccu3fIYrGbk873xF9RCpbItNDBWtYbg3jIbLxMWJfa2nwWzk29m
4VrPeV+z3U7avzsIMW32zxJeK4avcHdHUXgzB6hhGX1XuimyJnCPKgTw3yGLNxE=
=AQN2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----