[Uram-rejections] Arduino- Radio Applications

[webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 The message appear quite directed to the abusive stage



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/uram/
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Jan 13 14:59:38 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Huge <Huge at nowhere.much.invalid>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Re: Arduino- Radio Applications
> Date: 13 Jan 2016 14:59:28 GMT
> Organization: Piglet's Pickles & Preserves
> Message-ID: <dfn72gF363fU2 at mid.individual.net>
> References: <n7359l$km4$1 at dont-email.me> <n73a10$n0v$1 at news.albasani.net>
>  <n75h2j$gfi$1 at dont-email.me>
> Reply-To: usenet at huge.org.uk
> X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net BlCJ9z2WLh/TDQfYKpGzkQDtuITOaOf97kZWMO5KZGDRfYUdpm
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:8UjsFNisZYjUJGMslmvlaYXHDm0=
> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
> X-No-Archive:    Yes
> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
> X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5
> X-ZEDAT-Hint: R
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 44163878
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 56966653.13545-4fe4-8
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-8.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> On 2016-01-13, Iain Young, G7III <g7iii at g7iii.net> wrote:
> > On 12/01/16 16:35, David Wade wrote:
> 
> [snippage]
> 
> >> Its fine if you want low-level precise timing, but for other things its
> >> hard...
> >
> > low-level precise timing ? *Perks up*
> >
> > How precise are we talking ? milliseconds ? hundreds of microseconds ? 
> > tens ?
> >
> > I didn't realise they were real-time ? (In fact I thought with the
> > libraries etc etc they were distinctly not real-time.
> 
> "Real time" only means anything in relation to whatever it is you're trying to measure/control/interface. I've done "real time" work where response times in minutes were perfectly acceptable!
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't have an attitude problem.  If you have a problem with my
>               attitude, that's your problem.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWlmbKAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeVpIH/05jdRqctbqPgPv1OAwNwpC6
rdD8GzCJ8pSuNPGcZRbwghAvQHaa5OUO/lQupTHGZRgpegAgv9KGzC3ZhEAgSBOL
dBEsY+fdj+piiuyBFX9LwbxAEhYX8IB2Y0HRaR/HyTUqNmxJi5fZSS4CzoO0q5F8
DTIRnDq4pODwv+M0dp8aKBNttTvWrBadVwyaFwY4WHunxNkkmw7GbXP8tFaNQbVF
Z2vR8l0xS/FJx7loWBVS3uYFUTZuMGHZwA8PWh2UmzXAtFrajuHbPB4wbLuoWEQ4
3k7ukMrEmUttFkBXcP8JGMOa0hmRby0BDbhmKoYdaFO94gHzN8lhiJALdWLJmO0=
=tiSF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----