[Uram-rejections] Moderation in all things.

webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk webstump+uram-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Wed Jan 6 01:04:43 GMT 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



The post that you submitted to uk.radio.amateur.moderated has been rejected by a
moderator. 

Discussions about whether someone's post should have been rejected or
accepted are not generally permitted in the group, and should be taken
to uk.net.news.moderation.

The group charter and moderation policy can be found at
  http://www.panix.com/~rram/usenet/ukram/index.html
Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup
  uk.net.news.moderation

============================================ Full text of your message follows
> From webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk Wed Jan 06 00:32:45 2016
> Return-path: <webstump at chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk
> X-Envelope-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Forwarding-To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> Delivered-To: forwarding-uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eternal-september.org
> To: uk-radio-amateur-moderated at usenet.org.uk
> From: Graham. <graham-usenet at mail.com>
> Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur.moderated
> Subject: Moderation in all things.
> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:32:40 +0000
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Message-ID: <9vno8b9p75q3g2aeglrnh15lbgrclr33o5 at 4ax.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+5SFklH50qV84TAXg5NmvKmtXIgsLOQT/Gfz627N7WxQ==
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:QrLBy5MAM365Yn8GZtLNgYgPSEs=
> X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 42298592
> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 568c60ad.3bd1-262e-2
> X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1748292
> X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net
> 
> I thought it would be useful to have a discussion about the level of
> moderation in this group.
> 
> It must be a thankless task at times to be a moderator. The very word
> sounds like a euphemism for censor, and congers up a few others, like
> spoilsport and killjoy.
> 
> One day in July 1999 I came home with a 14.4kb/s modem that I had
> “borrowed” from work, plugged it into my 486DX66 PC, signed up for an
> X-Stream account and I had arrived on the Internet.
> 
> Within an hour or two I had discovered HTTP, SMTP, and of course NNTP,
> which looked particularly interesting, and I have used it almost daily
> ever since.
> 
> So in which group did I make my maiden post?  No prizes for guessing,
> and here it is, in all its newbie naivety, with my caps lock firmly
> on.
> 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/uk.radio.amateur/gGoPKm7C-HU/s2qiftVPY8EJ
> 
> Although it’s not evident from the replies I got that first day, it
> soon became clear to me that u.r.a was not for me, there were people
> intent on destroying sensible discussion, and although I must have
> made countless thousands of posts and read many more, only a handful
> were made to u.r.a.
> 
> We all know that “moderation” does not sit well with Usenet. It’s
> against the spirit of the medium, but clearly in the case of our
> beleaguered group u.r.a, something had to be done.
> 
> So I decided to support u.r.a.m, admittedly after it was created, and
> I have read it daily, and made a couple of posts.
> 
> Yes, it’s frustrating they don’t appear instantly, but that’s the
> price we pay to keep the IQ0 operators away.
> 
> So here I was, reading the Wireless World thread, and to my dismay
> Brian wants to terminate it (Did I mention that Usenet moderation can
> be a thankless task?)
> 
> So, assuming I don’t get “moderated” what does the team think?
> What criteria should be used when moderating this group?
> 
> 73s G3ZVT
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Graham.
> 
> %Profound_observation%
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWjGgsAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeZ7YH/Apy3sD16l+mIm2gW4td5CFy
Y00GJrh9z1mNFyYgpYg8L7VF1H7fN6U7RhcMBZUnNlcrcChOLRUAY3rcYe2//mbT
s8JxsD9pLvNRiUkKfKFQNuYAxn/DA3TmO02XCNPGm/0lB3gWHzd0WmqCYnnIZ+aC
Sbet5PhJ9FXm5dTBnYskyCD0yrBz9HLlAoJlhmLfl0AD3/52a0vhgZXfxbeN1KVF
7JsZNOrcTFR+WhzjXpAgje5E6Tl4LaFj/BdIhJy0Jm+jwASfJFtUH/v3yALS/P7K
FPxtq/3KCiFZB9Vn772U5z8s8PYXEjB1QYfPCjDmZDmfyz8b76dn0NGoBmLgGJ8=
=LLhQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Uram-rejections mailing list