Data retention question

[Roland Perry]

In article <53C6F21D.7050205 at talkunafraid.co.uk>, James Harrison 
<james at talkunafraid.co.uk> writes
>> Because all the issues have been aired at length for some time. Not
>> just since April but in the debates surrounding the 2012 comms data
>> bill.
>
>So future debate is irrelevant and we should give up, they've made up
>their minds because the issue's been talked about enough? This
>specific bill must be fine as a result?

Future debate is important, and the bill could be changed (either more 
or less stringent rules, obviously). But it doesn't have to be done as a 
spectator sport in the chamber, with MPs giving up the other work they 
were already booked to do that particular afternoon.
-- 
Roland Perry