Starmer dumps doormat?

[Roland Perry]

In article <4D37EE2E.4070304 at iosis.co.uk>, Peter Tomlinson 
<pwt at iosis.co.uk> writes
>> But what about inbound items (email or postal) marked "Private and 
>>Confidential"?
>>
>Seems to me that expecting third parties to respect that just because 
>of the way the message is marked has to rely on the integrity of those 
>encountering the message, not on the law.

It seems a pretty clear way of expressing consent (or lack of). And if 
the law is formed around the concept of consent, surely you have to make 
some effort to determine consent (isn't that what the current RIPA 
amendments are all about?)
-- 
Roland Perry