The Information Commission and the Leveson Inquiry
Caspar Bowden
tharg at gmx.net
Fri Dec 23 19:26:41 GMT 2011
This may be relevant
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmhaff/907/907we0
3.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: ukcrypto-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk
[mailto:ukcrypto-bounces at chiark.greenend.org.uk] On Behalf Of Peter
Fairbrother
Sent: 21 December 2011 12:50
To: UK Cryptography Policy Discussion Group
Subject: Re: The Information Commission and the Leveson Inquiry
John Wilson wrote:
> On 21 December 2011 09:53, Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186 at zen.co.uk>
wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> Does anyone know, was it the same counsel (Bernard Thorogood) who
>> advised the previous Met Commissioner that in order to get
>> convictions the Police would have to prove that telephone voice
>> messages were intercepted before being "read" (listened to) by their
intended recipients?
>
>
> The Bar Directory only shows one Bernard Thorogood
Yes, but did he so advise the ex Met Commissioner, or was that someone else?
Thanks,
-- Peter Fairbrother
>
> John Wilson
>
>
More information about the ukcrypto
mailing list