Consultation on change to RIP interception definition ("unintentional interception")

[Ian Mason]

On 18 Nov 2010, at 23:35, Richard Clayton wrote:

> In article <F3145DA6-9DB9-491B-B98F-B1FDDD9BCD11 at batten.eu.org>, Ian
> Batten <igb at batten.eu.org> writes
>
>> I trust ISPs don't propagate routes for RFC1918 any more...
>
> all the time :(
>
> at present [4pm, as measured at RIPE]
>
>         AS6067 is announcing 10.100.100.100/30
>
> AS6067 is based in Middlesbrough...
>
> ... if you want to see a further list of current specious  
> announcements
> see:
>         http://www.cymru.com/BGP/bogons.html
>
> -- 
> richard                                                   Richard  
> Clayton
>
> Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little  
> temporary
> Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11  
> Nov 1755



Ah, well. We all claim to be that which we are not. Especially if we  
are in our cups, which most men who post on the wee hours are, justly  
or not, suspected of.

Bedtime...... ;-)

Ian