Consultation on change to RIP interception definition

[Roland Perry]

In article <4CDBBF17.3070209 at iosis.co.uk>, Peter Tomlinson 
<pwt at iosis.co.uk> writes
>It seems to me that the assumption will be that the owner of the 
>account will have given consent on behalf of all users of the account 
>(typically of that keyboard). So consent ought to be given in some 
>secure manner (a) that is logged in a way that can be verified and, if 
>the user wishes, changed,

If the CSP was a PAYG (or free) wifi point, that would add a whole extra 
layer to the sign-up process. Plus all CSPs having to add some sort of 
permanently accessible account parameters. I now that the transparency 
is desirable, but worry about the implementation.

>and (b) that, if consent has been given, ensures that an informative 
>logo is always displayed in each browser window.

How would that work - the CSP intercepting every web page and adding 
something that he fondly believes every browser in the world would 
display?

ps HTTP is not the only protocol on the Internet.
-- 
Roland Perry