[SECNET RFC PATCH 4/4] sig: Move hashing into algorithm [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson]

Ian Jackson writes ("[SECNET RFC PATCH 4/4] sig: Move hashing into algorithm"):
> I think it should be up to the pk algorithm to decide on the hash
> function, at least in the usual case.  When we have key rollover and
> proper enrolment, a public key declaration by a site should specify
> precisely the validation algorithm including the hash function.

I have applied these four, and also a patch removing `sig' from the
names of members of struct alg_msg_data.

Ian Jackson writes ("[SECNET RFC PATCH 2/5] hash: Provide and use hash_hash connvenience function"):
> No functional change.

I have applied the first two here, relating to hashing.  The new
signature scheme interface is still somewhat in flux, so I am leaving
that for now.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.