Bug#940034: libelogind0: replacing a core system library and conflicting against the default init considered harmful
Thorsten Glaser
t.glaser at tarent.de
Sat Sep 28 01:52:14 BST 2019
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > The "init" package has the "Important: yes" control field which as I
> That flag is not for "without an explicit user choice". It's for "you're
> breaking the packaging system, far more than ignoring dependencies".
This is wrong.
> It's the biggest hammer dpkg has.
This is wrong; the biggest hammer is Conflicts without Replaces,
or Pre-Depends.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"
More information about the Debian-init-diversity
mailing list