From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Sun Dec 07 14:33:00 2025 Return-path: To: JNugent73 at ..il.com Subject: Re: Re: Budget details leaked References: <5995715015.18b59989@uninhabited.net> <10geich$gc0t$22@dont-email.me> <3PH2HEgcv8KpFAYv@perry.uk> <10gpb6g$3a4d5$1@dont-email.me> <10h1n0l$2jfah$1@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [176506557119746] reject repetition Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 14:33:00 +0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post repeats a recent post or a recent query without appearing to add anything new. You could try to discuss the topic from a different angle or wait a few weeks until it seems right to bring up this subject again. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Sat Dec 06 23:59:31 2025 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Authentication-Results: mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uni-berlin.de; dkim=pass header.d=uni-berlin.de header.s=fub01 header.a=rsa-sha256 > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:From: Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To: References; bh=GeI+x2YpnS7n1IiMOddB98t1b4WDVIS0bLXR1DluY1U=; t=1765065565; x=1765670365; b=EF1BC/L+0Sc7q/9y6pZXj6umu/4Z9h4APAIhUBXNvWpOJROBLWk0GbMxPQsKd Gz32KDP3su4Pmu > From: JNugent > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Budget details leaked > Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 23:59:23 +0000 > Organization: Home User > Message-ID: > References: > <5995715015.18b59989@uninhabited.net> > <10geich$gc0t$22@dont-email.me> <3PH2HEgcv8KpFAYv@perry.uk> > > > > > > > <10gpb6g$3a4d5$1@dont-email.me> > <10h1n0l$2jfah$1@dont-email.me> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net 7PHi2qmiqavQ/wLtd5lzLwYqxrNix06lNxDAlTDwvyQuVgDITH > Cancel-Lock: sha1:PWM1dML3F15V40wX0qg9lP9RpOU= sha256:YdKoS90x7hFi8v7t9Pg+mbrSVZmH6Zequq6C60AMUK8= > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Content-Language: en-US > X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 251206-6, 12/6/2025), Outbound message > X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 68 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.8 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Authentication-Results: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 06/12/2025 04:52 pm, billy bookcase wrote: > > "JNugent" wrote in message news:mphdtfFpe9oU3@mid.individual.net... > >> On 03/12/2025 12:41 pm, billy bookcase wrote: > >>> "Norman Wells" wrote in message > >>> news:mp9ccpFelcsU1@mid.individual.net... > >>>> On 02/12/2025 22:38, Roland Perry wrote: > >>>>> In message , at 17:21:18 on Tue, 2 Dec 2025, > >>>>> JNugent > >>>>> remarked: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> by taking that wafer-thin majority > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 8% is not "wafer thin". > >>>>> > >>>>> Nor was the majority 8% > >>>>> > >>>>> People who think that are so arithmetically challenged that nothing they say can be > >>>>> taken seriously. > >>>> > >>>> Let's see how mathematically challenged anyone is. > >>>> > >>>> Do you accept that the overall vote in the UK amounted as near as dammit to 108 votes > >>>> to leave for every 100 votes to remain? > >>> > >>> And 8 into 208 reopresents what percentage exactly ? > >> > >> Is this a new version of the three-card trick? > > > > No Just simple arithmetic > > > > On those figures, the winning margin in the Brexit Referendum was 3.84 % > > The winning margin was 8%. > > One faction got 8% more votes than the other faction. > > If you are simply going to try to say that they did not win by that 8% > margin, you are wasting your breath. > > > > And not 8%; as you've presumably been claiming for the past 8 years. > > > > quote: > > > > "JNugent" wrote in message news:mp8lgeFb0ggU1@mid.individual.net... > > > >> On 02/12/2025 12:44 pm, Jon Ribbens wrote: > >> > >>> by taking that wafer-thin majority > >> > >> 8% is not "wafer thin". > > > > :unquote > > > > However when the winning margin of votes 1269501, is divided into the > > total number of votes of 33551983, this gives a more accurate figure > > of 3.78%. > > So what? > > Leave got 8% more then Remain. > > Them's the facts. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmk1kBwACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x7/KAf/ZaPGJYDHUVeAU0XF72EIW7jbN6jtrIMsFmMDnBMCMck7bEf9JOCEBM/+ dVN2qwO5XaqUEszxO+TH/g9xjsZoTqsbhBQf340KPqPufNAamWogh0Lrhj41ynAG 6TAaJSM9XDGO2Xm29Sfs23/7x0uK44itXTsFf0gF3dRrkOF4LObfDFRrfurG7k0C srhC9p5uZmgmVXKs8fTuAAq4D00Si0bZtxZ/RNFt1RRYZyafp3ODLqL+wFM4Gj9D 35ltFvjSlRWN/eC8fFho2Za6HY/M3QEZQzjmRUNqbz+vtE6ixtvgqbmPpKcvNCu8 oJbTPRBLyJ8yY1cYUeXW1sl1FJRHQg== =6SHl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----