From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Tue May 27 22:31:21 2025 Return-path: To: hex at ..seen.ac.am Subject: Re: Re: Solicitor prepayment for conveyancing estate sale References: <100fmme$1na26$2@dont-email.me> <1014ogd$2mn80$1@dont-email.me> <9q6c3kls84fhtc0rj7i4lob663m8h9trnc@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [174837846025985] reject notnew Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 22:31:21 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too repetitive. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue May 27 21:41:00 2025 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Received-SPF: pass (mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com: domain of uni-berlin.de designates 130.133.4.89 as permitted sender) client-ip=130.133.4.89; envelope-from=mod-submit@uni-berlin.de; helo=outpost5.zedat.fu-berlin.de; > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U1kn2QqGUlYJC8Er6lEcsNIh8aYodp4CeFKezNZshSA=; t=1748378457; x=1748983257; b=mDIsHSy8DnWzAr1 > From: Norman Wells > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Solicitor prepayment for conveyancing estate sale > Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 21:40:56 +0100 > Message-ID: > References: <100fmme$1na26$2@dont-email.me> > > > > > > > <1014ogd$2mn80$1@dont-email.me> <9q6c3kls84fhtc0rj7i4lob663m8h9trnc@4ax.com> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net 0bwp1G2AByJBgA5tKJua2gTFzoFW/dVm1EIIJ//XrxWVUgOCvk > Cancel-Lock: sha1:v/AajnYrFWtHx55Q2MH1/uCr7Mc= sha256:fw7TQCKvV+LybkBMGYEezBUaEMipDDV3wLB4AUDLuIU= > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Content-Language: en-GB > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 29 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 27/05/2025 21:17, Mark Goodge wrote: > > On Tue, 27 May 2025 17:16:13 +0100, GB wrote: > > > >> On 25/05/2025 15:38, Roland Perry wrote: > >> > >>> "Vacant possession" for the umpteenth time, is what they commonly > >>> describe a house that's empty when you view. Nothing whatsoever to > >>> do with happens after the completion of the sale. > >> > >> I haven't seen that particular phrase used by EAs on their particulars. > >> But, I have seen 'chain free'. 'Executor sale'. 'Mortgagees in > >> possession'. ('We have keys' is a more subtle version.) > > > > "Vacant possession" is a phrase associated with tenanted or commercial > > property. It basically means that there will be no sitting tenant on > > completion day, leaving the new owner free to do what they want (refurbish, > > occupy personally, find a new tenant) with an empty property rather than > > inheriting a tenant from the previous owner. It's not a phrase typically > > associated with a sale from one owner-ocupier to another. > > It actually is. And it means exactly what my previous references say it > means, ie that the new owner will not be encumbered by anything, whether > other occupiers or left possessions. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmg2LykACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x5Akgf7BfXM20exV9YHc3dApoJCMtR83xNACrjzzwaNvcqGcOcsXJ47atG/dc7z WWWuJMJiM0sGKHM5YWHAqXcYyogPQvJ+50jPEWuiBPFS+nPb7Gm3vPxPkHHmR2xw bcCwIZJW5KW2SRByj8/7NTD9Sp7iVfG5uJ8XS25AxrQo64kFtSUJ14TVfQYU9NR+ IBymZ2rFvUQlk3WbMWNT0VKkZaIBij9F5qysIEUWVqqoMX9O9UN+09V0EH2ksQyl FNHnbUQuoAeHR4ws9KE5xlxAsv0ImbgYdV+nzrMnL6211QIRwioGsL9nHRKtbQHA uq7OkfxdGexQT/ujNWs7VPonUw/iLA== =0IhO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----