From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Tue May 27 21:22:19 2025 Return-path: To: uklm at ..rmabulator.33mail.com Subject: Re: Re: Solicitor struck off for criticising Israel on Twitter References: <0497084293.40eae291@uninhabited.net> <1005aro$3861h$2@dont-email.me> <100sfa8$mruj$2@dont-email.me> <100sjb7$nq8f$2@dont-email.me> <100uq7q$1ag08$2@dont-email.me> <100vb73$1du2m$1@dont-email.me> <1011qb0$20tc6$1@dont-email.me> <101495g$2jea4$1@dont-email.me> <1014gqt$2la4u$1@dont-email.me> <101522i$2p3u9$1@dont-email.me> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [174837533810032] reject notnew Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 21:22:19 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too repetitive. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue May 27 20:48:58 2025 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Received-SPF: pass (mailhub-hex-d.mythic-beasts.com: domain of eternal-september.org designates 2a01:4f9:c010:ad8c::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a01:4f9:c010:ad8c::1; envelope-from=news@eternal-september.org; helo=smtp.eternal-september.org; > Authentication-Results: name/66C7E609FC; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=permabulator.33mail.com > To: uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > From: Pamela > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Solicitor struck off for criticising Israel on Twitter > Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 20:48:45 +0100 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Message-ID: > References: <0497084293.40eae291@uninhabited.net> <1005aro$3861h$2@dont-email.me> <100sfa8$mruj$2@dont-email.me> <100sjb7$nq8f$2@dont-email.me> <100uq7q$1ag08$2@dont-email.me> <100vb73$1du2m$1@dont-email.me> <1011qb0$20tc6$1@dont-email.me> <101495g$2jea4$1@dont-email.me> <1014gqt$2la4u$1@dont-email.me> <101522i$2p3u9$1@dont-email.me> > Injection-Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 21:48:54 +0200 (CEST) > User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01 > Cancel-Lock: sha1:YHQM77gH8yfSotMIRVlM9cdFOs8= > X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/bVTOsBlKYkVNwdzmp330joRSXrQJtRtL88RAbwYccxA== > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on smtp.eternal-september.org > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 20 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: X-Spam-Checker-Version: > > On 19:59 27 May 2025, GB said: > > On 27/05/2025 18:44, The Todal wrote: > >>> > >>> [SNIP] > >>> > >>> And, just for the record, we don't need to wait for the wreck of > >>> The Bayesian to be raised to be absolutely sure that it wasn't sunk > >>> by an underwater bomb. > >> > >> I don't recall anyone suggesting that as a possibility. > > > > You don't have an obligation to read and memorise every post on this > > NG, so don't feel bad about not remembering that particular > > sub-thread. > > > > So, let's turn to this thread. Apparently, a bomb hit a drainage > > ditch in Gaza. Several obviously plausible explanations spring to > > mind: > > a) there was a legitimate target underneath, b) faulty > > intelligence, and there wasn't, c) the bomb was off target ... > > > > But, instead a poster seriously advanced the theory (as fact) that > > the IDF is intent on destroying the infrastructure of Gaza by bombing > > drainage ditches. It's a lunatic theory. Apart from anything else, > > they could do the job far more effectively with a bulldozer. > > > > I'm choosing to rebut utterly absurd statements. I did the same with > > some of the more seriously deranged statements about the Bayesian. > > I don't know why you bother to rebut absurd statements about the Gaza > war because they keep on coming and no one seems to learn anything. > > One thing reading recent posts here has shown is how emotions can > override perception and logic of what are, normally, perfectly rational > posters. > > I dare say they might think the same about my views, but ultimately the > underlying factual truth determines who is right or wrong. Some of the > fantasy assertions are just plain wrong. > > I suppose if one wants a good old knockabout discussion, then it's > worth participating in the back and forth .... but the whole thing > inevitably turns out inconclusive. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmg2HvsACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x6uTwgAubZJ3R1tSd8x6i1ImiIqCfYW6o7tD66iz4JksbmZZx/nAeRecFjpGBeU hEFf9OmZswRn81Royk/jir9LeZThsgtY3ly/wzZhnqe6dVxsU1CkEQWc6ovIDWLr HL7L7iSeCpvZq7pjQBYRpqJ27lEAEzvcsEmBFvq1tzKRb0qGP2uWswoR+5L4aKHp ClcDBPp31S/dK4KYjAEn0A1Cl4bXdYhmzk3LIC6a/1gWmhpTNZoZwvRZBeqyKdUE 7s7wJz/zzmnkMw5QryrKT2qAsYGTyyhG/JglkS/HE4YXVYNVA/tF2IslS4KEj81g 7NZ5j93G4E74OlFWMVS5D+dcopqViQ== =nIE4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----