From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Tue Aug 13 15:32:11 2024 Return-path: To: NOTsomeone at ..crosoft.invalid Subject: Re: Re: Shamima Begum References: <9461435972.20da152c@uninhabited.net> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [17235574229124] reject notnew Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:32:11 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This post contains insufficient new material. Similar points have been made already in this discussion, which is in danger of becoming too repetitive. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Tue Aug 13 14:57:02 2024 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Received-SPF: pass (mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com: domain of eternal-september.org designates 2a01:4f9:c010:ad8c::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a01:4f9:c010:ad8c::1; envelope-from=news@eternal-september.org; helo=smtp.eternal-september.org; > Authentication-Results: name/D87A15F84A; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=microsoft.invalid > To: uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > From: GB > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Shamima Begum > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14:56:58 +0100 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Message-ID: > References: > > <9461435972.20da152c@uninhabited.net> > > > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:56:59 +0200 (CEST) > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Cancel-Lock: sha1:P0Vrf9Ln19rflRnkAhIXXezDKW8= > X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/asUpeEIDDtiavB0gq3zF3ypZKudzEVbg= > Content-Language: en-GB > X-Spam-Level: ** > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on smtp.eternal-september.org > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 25 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: X-Spam-Checker-Version: > > On 13/08/2024 13:52, The Todal wrote: > > On 13/08/2024 13:30, GB wrote: > >> On 13/08/2024 11:42, The Todal wrote: > >> > >>> I can see this is really bothering you, Norman. I think you can rest > >>> assured that if and when necessary the Home Secretary will take > >>> advice from the law officers of the Crown who will decide whether she > >>> has executive powers to cover the situation or whether some sort of > >>> statutory instrument might be required. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> I asked "are you suggesting that she can be 'un-deprived'?", and you > >> said "Yes, of course".  If you were not sure whether new primary or > >> secondary legislation would be required, it would have been even > >> better if you had said so. > >> > > > > That's called pettifogging. > > We already knew that Parliament has almost unfettered powers. The > question had been raised in the context that Norman had queried whether > the Home Sec has the power. > > > It would have been better if you had > > contributed usefully to the discussion, or held your tongue. > > I thought that correcting a previous misstatement is useful. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAma7bmsACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x6b3wgAp0fkF+oQasm7mfMPMzRk01qBxEIECII7UKHG1ZJbkXR8ah7UGN7gjNFF z6rTz5HHglxVKvuhH9I0uIdIJ4A3NEaGHosL8oHR7dob8jVszFS4r9LqHWtFuuAs bEcgPPfXNoTXyknF0Q6fqJPYMn6dnjSOrlXMbIoeetJLed8Q/ec1bDfyB3NeHdD/ ILPSgHNfKgDjLitwEIK9k5aEjVJCAgW+o8t0ik467HLsQGfBcs27HwlHdar7FcfT PpnlN2hhGJHeOy0+rN+IENHjvderDEpJvo1BxrZGgpG/FgJ+/UYKpq0PHFrUMEO/ JM2/+eBWoGQQ5idJ8yALzp+++GVQPw== =BK3B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----