From webstump at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Thu Aug 01 15:58:38 2024 Return-path: To: hex at ..seen.ac.am Subject: Re: Re: Winter fuel payments References: <5729259253.ad00536a@uninhabited.net> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: matthewv+ulmtestmod at ..riolis.greenend.org.uk Errors-To: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk X-Webstump-Event: [172252318815370] reject offtopic Message-Id: From: webstump+ulm-bounces at ..iark.greenend.org.uk Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:58:37 +0100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The post that you submitted to uk.legal.moderated has been rejected by a moderator. This appears to the moderator to be off-topic for uk.legal.moderated or has insufficient law-related material. The group charter and moderation policy can be found at https://uklegal.weebly.com/ Disputed moderation decisions can be discussed in the newsgroup uk.net.news.moderation ============================================ Full text of your message follows > From webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk Thu Aug 01 15:39:48 2024 > Return-path: > Envelope-to: webstump+?@slimy.greenend.org.uk > Received-SPF: pass (mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com: domain of uni-berlin.de designates 130.133.4.89 as permitted sender) client-ip=130.133.4.89; envelope-from=mod-submit@uni-berlin.de; helo=outpost5.zedat.fu-berlin.de; > X-STUMP-Warning-0: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-1: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-2: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > X-STUMP-Warning-3: Next header (DKIM-Signature) truncated! > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-berlin.de; s=fub01; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nMoywyPPFok3sMCmTTIt1hYcXm/S26bz7puh/twXvPA=; t=1722523185; x=1723127985; b=LyyNleDQpdi3I+L > From: Norman Wells > Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated > Subject: Re: Winter fuel payments > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:39:43 +0100 > Message-ID: > References: > <5729259253.ad00536a@uninhabited.net> > > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Orig-X-Trace: individual.net olC+P9TJv/BxYXUZ8P9U2Ah05hVhvFlUb+RqARVNnRFwBUO927 > Cancel-Lock: sha1:mQ6pG8HPeh5FUhKqhZCjwRUarYk= sha256:e80joRa7WwPWTGEAO2STrA9dl54XBdsZrS0RlfJ40zA= > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird > Content-Language: en-GB > X-Originating-IP: 130.133.4.5 > X-ZEDAT-Hint: RO > X-Mythic-Source-External: YES > X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 17 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 > Delivered-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-BlackCat-To: usenet-uk-legal-moderated@usenet.org.uk > X-Mythic-Originator: uid-1081-on-lynx.mythic-beasts.com > X-STUMP-Warning-4: Unfolded headers Received: Received: Received: Received: Received: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: DKIM-Signature: > > On 01/08/2024 14:41, RJH wrote: > > On 1 Aug 2024 at 12:22:45 BST, Norman Wells wrote: > > > >>
> As per Norman's > >>> definition, the food is "nutritious" in the sense that it will prevent > >>> death by starvation. It doesn't follow that one source of protein and > >>> carbohydrates is just as good as any other. > >> > >> But it is. And to understand that, you need to know a bit about the > >> chemical processes of digestion and regeneration. Whenever you consume > >> any protein from any source, digestion reduces it to its constituent > >> amino acids, of which there are only 20. Similarly, carbohydrates of > >> any origin are digested down to the simple sugars, eg glucose, which > >> comprise them. Fats and oils are broken down into their constituents > >> too. Your body then decides, based on need, the molecules it needs to > >> construct from those basic building blocks to allow tissue regeneration, > >> energy storage (as glycogen, fat) etc. > >> > >> You are only 'what you eat' on a molecular level. You do not get > >> 'better' or indeed different protein from a steak or a salmon than a > >> hamburger. You do not get 'better' carbohydrates from pasta than from > >> chips. You do not get more nutritious fats from olive oil than from > >> butter. Your body does not care. It demolishes *all* food down to the > >> common bricks from which it can rebuild what it wants. > > > > I'm assuming your career in school food standards was fairly short-lived . . . > > Why? If the authorities thought my views to be heresy, they'd be > denying well-established proven facts, aka the truth. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEfWu6wfyjzX88oocanSrwpvmn4x4FAmarop0ACgkQnSrwpvmn 4x54iwf+MybOoRLi5uy1niA7XSiVKokugNIFYhdnyN14POkqAcu3FQxqX9wLsvXw 6+pe7MNRwTPV1ukAWdBLRJQJz1oJbL+6lSqcj3b6tRCQIgUFIv8LFBdTPDG88Dm+ lMvR3GdxtbZuBzg3tStwoAirkebayNLnWQCRSPhSbcx5Q5ZwSy1Utw8VnDv9rzAJ 1I6D6GwUn/rVAyBQEb0W5BPyG3VQv6F7MnAlgh7dQ3PEcaxs8iX3SgU7PfT393TQ O0ynSSkbSt2Xlj8aa17evn3C1AtjUByc6zadJAN/ZYMLHHYxEQKP3oDQh0gcDKmd T9A+mEkwN5+UalV7+Pt+rzWB6tAdWg== =aHmM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----