The Fascist Game - results of Game 2
This is the log of the second run of The
Fascist Game.
Proposals and decisions
Proposal 1
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 14:45:01 GMT
Proposer: Jeff Linthicum
Salutation: None.
Proposal: Only rules whose numbers are multiples of 3 may contain any
punctuation other than commas and periods.
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: Insolent dogs who can't address their Emperor
properly do not deserve my attention. [Rule 14]
Score: 0 points.
Total: 0 points.
Proposal 2
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 08:55:48 GMT
Proposer: Pierre-Yves Lochou
Salutation: O dear Master, I have a humble proposition for a rule
Proposal: Any proposal done by a player whose name begins with a 'L'
or a 'P' will be refused.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 25.
Decision: Rejected, as your own name begins with a 'P'.
Reason: Rule 25.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 3
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 10:21:36 GMT
Proposer: Per Abrahamsen
Salutation: Most Unlikely Emperor
Proposal: I propose Per Abrahamsen is not given 19 bonus
points for abusing rule 25.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Rule 25. Per is to be subjected to 19 lashes by The
Sadistic Gaoler for his foolish attempt to win by paradox. The
only winners in this game earn their reward by good, honest spotting
of spelling mistakes. (Lash^19!).
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal4
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 13:12:12 GMT
Proposer: Jon Care
Salutation: Oh Mighty Emperor, before who we are but toe-clippings of life
Proposal: All new players wishing to join the game must submit a proposal.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Since the only interaction between players and "The Game" is
via proposals, any new player who didn't submit a proposal
would be having a very boring (not to mention unacknowledged) game.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 5
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 17:41:33 GMT
Proposer: James Huggins
Salutation: Oh most royal personage, consider my rule proposal
Proposal: Any proposal from a player whose name has the same number of
letters as the Imperious Emperor shall receive one bonus point,
regardless of its eventual treatment by the Imperious Emperor.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 26.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 3 points.
Proclamation 6
The Imperious Emperor decrees that, since rules are now
appearing which discriminate between players, players should be
allowed to adopt pseudonyms of their choice, as many as they like per
game, but points will be kept separate for each pseudonym. Ie. if
John Smith has 2 pseudonyms, Fred X and Jim
Y, and submits a proposal which is accepted under each
pseudonym, the score board will show that Fred X and Jim Y each have 3
points, not that John Smith has 6 points. Of course, players
may continue to enter under their real names.
Enacted as Rule 27.
Proposal 7
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 94 13:41:25 GMT
Proposer: Olivier Marcé
Salutation: Light of our days, here is my proposal
Proposal: As mentioned during the previous game, all rules which
discriminates or advantages a player, and not based on the proposed
rules or the score of these player is a deep insult made thrown to
the face to our Sublime Emperor : only Him can decide to discriminate
or advantage a player by this way.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: The Imperious Emperor considers it a deep insult to
be ordered to overturn a law in this way. You have options: either
change your identity or propose laws that disadvantage your
competitors more than yourself. (The Imperious Emperor warns
all players to be wary in this latter respect, however; He does not
suffer great silliness lightly!)
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 8
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 94 15:21:13 GMT
Proposer: James Huggins
Salutation: Oh most glorious emperor, hear my plea for this
proposed rule
Proposal: The Humble Scribe shall note in the current state
of play the last date on which the state of play was changed.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: The Emperor does not concern himself with matters of
administration.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 9
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 94 22:34:15 GMT
Proposer: Piper Jackson
Salutation: To the Imperious Emperor, who is the Heart and Soul of the
Universe's existence
Proposal: In homage to the Imperious Emperor, all new proposals must
begin with the letter i and end with the letter e.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Far too banal!
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 10
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 94 15:01:19 GMT
Proposer: Jon Care
Salutation: Oh most effulgent Emperor, whose plangent utterings
illuminate the souls of thy subjects
Proposal: Any proposal that does not increase the happiness of the
emperor's subjects (in the judgement of the emperor) will be
rejected.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 28.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 11
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 11:13:30 GMT
Proposer: Huw Morris
Salutation: Ineffable mighty one, hear my plea for a proposal, even
though my thoughts are as inconsequential to you as a Guatemalan
warthog's
Proposal: Any player whose proposal is rejected should have to submit
a limerick or 4 line couplet expressing the extent of your glory.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: I don't know what a couplet is, so I rejected this
proposal. Don't use long words to your Emperor.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 12
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 94 08:19:08 GMT
Proposer: Riff Raffer
Salutation: My liege lord, who lights the dark cosmos with his wisdom,
yae even brighter than the Usenet Oracle, I beg of thee: hear my
proposal
Proposal: Lest any player become careless and inattentive to The
Imperious Emperor, allow me to propose that players make a new
proposal within two weeks of their previous proposal. Players who
fail to make a new proposal in time shall forfeit half their points,
rounded up. Addendum: Players who fail to propose a new rule within
four weeks forfeit their lives and are removed from play.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 29.
Score: 4 points (1 for name - awarded following Report 14).
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 13
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 19:46:39 GMT
Proposer: Philadelphia DeJesus
Salutation: His Royal Highness, Walker Between Worlds
Proposal: Any proposal including a specific reference to an individual
letter or letters will be ignored.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: All proposals are are composed entirely of specific
references to individual letters. Acceptance of this rule would lead
to ignoring all other proposals.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Report 14
Reporter: Riff Raffer
Salutation: Most Glorious Emperor, whose holdings stretch from
Thule to Land of the Rising Sun
Report: I regret to point out an error, The scribe appears to have
mistyped my score, for by Rule 26, a ten letter name gains one extra
point. Please instruct the scribe to correct his error.
Decision: Accepted.
Score: 2 points.
Total: 6 points.
Proposal 15
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 09:32:05 GMT
Proposer: Huw Morris
Salutation: Oh, Gracious One, who commands the very forces of
nature
Proposal: Sire, in the interests of game simplicity, and in order to
increase player happiness, I respectfully request that rule 22 be
struck from the statute book.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: If its game simplicity you're after, try the online TIC-TAC-TOE!
Score: 1 point.
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 16
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 94 11:18:48 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: Oh Imperious Emperor who art above us all
Proposal: I propose that The Humble Scribe record which of the
remaining rules was the last to earn its proposer an extra point due
to Rule 21.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: The Humble Scribe is overworked enough as it is!
[Thank you, Your Hugemungousness. THS]
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 17
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 94 11:24:32 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: Lo, Emperor of supreme Imperiousness whose merest shadow
leaves us in awe
Proposal: As there are not yet any palindromic rules, I propose that
Rule 19 be modified so that if either the rule OR the salutation is in
the form of a palindrome, that the bonus points be awarded. If BOTH
are palindromic, that great event should still only be worth 5 bonus
points.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: It is not the actual rule that has to be a palindrome, just
the proposal. The Humble Scribe is responsible for
transcibing the pigeon english most people seem to submit into the
glorious prose you get to see. As for the allegation that there have
been no palindromic responses, I advise you to seek out the origins of
Rule 24 in Game 1, and I expect you to show due respect when you
have! It may be difficult, but can be done and we are talking about
5 whole points!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 18
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 94 11:30:01 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: He whose smile makes the sun rise, and whose whim causes
giants to tremble, please consider must most unworthy proposal
Proposal: That I be appointed as Acting Sadistic Gaoler until
it comes to pass that the Official Sadistic Gaoler is
appointed, and that this appointment be recorded appropriately in the
rules by The Humble Servant. I would be happy to submit
suitable references if your grace desires.
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: Rule 12.
Score: 1 point (for name).
Total: 5 points.
Report 19
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 94 11:49:13 GMT
Reporter: Ten Letters
Salutation: Oh King of kings, Oh Lord of Lords, He shall reign forever
and ever more, hallelujah
Report: I hate to point it out, but the scribe has spelled "receive"
wrongly in "GMT last proposal was recieved". Doesn't he have a
dictionary?
Decision: Accepted.
Warning: Watch it with the puns - the day may come when the whim takes
me to arm The Humble Scribe, and then his retribution will be
dire indeed!
[Lick! Lick! Grovel, Grovel, Your Superlativeness. THS]
Score: 2 points.
Total: 7 points.
Proposal 20
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 94 11:54:47 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: Oh, Ho! Dude who is much greater than that B1WFF bloke.
Yo!
Proposal: I don't reckon no dudes should be allowed to call themselves
just "L". That'd be unrighteous. I propose, 'n all that guff, that
there be a new rule. "Name? No `L' alone, man!" That'd cheer the
guys up and be totally awesome.
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: Rule 12 (Again - this game is solely concerned with rules - it
may help to read the existing ones occasionally!)
Score: 1 point (for name).
Total: 8 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 08:55:48 GMT
Pierre-Yves Lochou loses one point.
Total: 0 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 10:21:36 GMT
Per Abrahamsen loses one point, leaving no points.
Total: 0 points.
Proposal 21
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 94 18:30:48 GMT
Proposer: Bob Steinke
Salutation: Oh great imperious one whose wisdom surpasses all our
understanding
Proposal: I propose to amend rule 16 so that its last phrase reads:
"So long as this does not change the specific set of words of said
proposal."
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: See reference to pigeon english earlier [Proposal 17].
The Humble Scribe performs an essential duty and should not
be hampered in his noble deeds.
[Awe, truly this man is the Son of Gawd, THS]
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Report 22
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 22:37:54 GMT
Reporter: Philadelphia DeJesus
Salutation: Overlord of The Civet Mines, Lord of the Aleph
Report: Proposals 17, 18 and 20 by Ten Letters were decided upon in
violation of rule number twelve, as they are all preceded by
non-ignored proposals by the same source.
Decision: Accepted.
Comment: You get your 2 points - I made a mistake! Ten letters keeps
his points - call it an act of god!
Score: 2 points.
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 23
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 94 10:21:43 GMT
Proposer: Huw Morris
Salutation: My liege, at whose feet I prostrate myself
Proposal: Your excellency, I propose that the first three proposals to
contain every letter of the alphabet be awarded a bonus of three
points.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 30
Score: 3 points.
Total: 5 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 94 13:41:25 GMT
Olivier Marcé loses one point.
Total: 0 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 94 15:21:13 GMT
James Huggins loses two points.
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 24
Proposer: David Lodge
Salutation: Oh great one who's toenail clippings we are not worther to
chew (with tomato sauce of course :)
Proposal: Every person who submits a proposal must wear a Tea Cozy on
his head.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: My subjects are free to indulge in whatever fetishes they care
for, but should not attempt to impose their own deviences on others.
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 25
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 14:03:49 GMT
Proposer: David Lodge
Salutation: Look, listen t'proposal an' I'll gie you a pint.
Proposal: That everybody type in t'Monty Python Yorkshire style. Aye
lad.
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: Rule 12.
Score: 1 point (for name).
Total: 3 points.
Report 26
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 14:07:27 GMT
Reporter: David Lodge
Salutation: vast prostrations and kissing of the heavenly feet
Report: Sorry, but Scribe has made a mistake: in the list of scores
he's listed the person with 5 points (ten letters) after the people
with 4 points.
Decision: Accepted.
Score: 2 points.
Total: 5 points.
Proposal 27
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 16:26:15 GMT
Proposer: Peter Zeller
Salutation: Dear highly exalted emporer
Proposal: I would like to propose that any submission that is accepted
and has more vowels than consonants gets an extra 3 points, unless, of
course, their are no words with at least three consecutive vowels.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 31.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 3 points.
Report 28
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 21:07:08 GMT
Reporter: Harla Quinn
Salutation: O Gloriously Perverse Philosopher-King
Report: Allow me to propose that either The Humble Scribe be
given ten strokes of the lash (light ones) for transcribing "pidgin
English" as "pigeon English", or else that Your Imperiousness should
supply each of your subjects with a suitably trained pigeon.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: In my kingdom the pigeons actually do talk in pidgin english,
so either phrase is equally appropriate.
Score: 0 points.
Total: 0 points.
Proposal 29
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 23:03:37 GMT
Proposer: Philadelphia DeJesus
Salutation: Oh magnificent weaver of webs
Proposal: I propose that we eat spam on Fridays.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Everyone already does eat spam on fridays, so your proposal
carries zero information content.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 30
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 23:07:21 GMT
Proposer: Philadelphia DeJesus
Salutation: Oh one who is wired and snapped
Proposal: I propose that those statements which pertain to the
betterment of the men of Fascist be rewarded with quantities of
spam.
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: Rule 12.
Score: 0 points.
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 31
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 94 23:10:06 GMT
Proposer: Philadelphia DeJesus
Salutation: To the keeper of the sacred chao
Proposal: I propose that any player whose proposals create a paradox
should recieve a bonus of five points.
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: Rule 12.
Score: 0 points.
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 32
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 94 02:55:36 GMT
Proposer: Chaos Maker
Salutation: O fascist dictator, slayer of innocents, scourge upon the
face of the earth
Proposal: Regeln die in einer Fremdsprache (mit Übersetzung)
vorgeschlagen werden, erhalten 2 Bonus-Punkte.
Translation: Rules which are proposed in a foreign language (with
translation) shall receive 2 bonus points.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: What is a foreign language? Every language is foreign to
someone, and hence all possible submissions in all possible languages
would have to receive a bonus under your rule.
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 33
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 94 07:10:33 GMT
Proposer: Fox for hire
Salutation: Oh lord of most excellent and confusing wisdom
Proposal: I would like to propose that the Sadistic Gaoler should
hereafter be referred to as Barney, in the interests of lessening the
fright of his name for the common people.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Barney is a far, far more terrifying name than TSG!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Report 34
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 94 03:31:42 GMT
Reporter: kiyoko aoki
Salutation: oh dear emperor
Report: I do believe that one of the proposals made and accepted in
the first game is not included in the current rules. The propsal that
a player who has a prime number of points shall receive a bonus
point.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: This proposal was accepted as a one off instantiation of a
rule by the then Emperor's strict adhesion to the letter of the law.
While we may now look back with a certain amount of nostalgia on
proposals of this calibre, the rulings of our precursors must still
stand.
Score: 0 points.
Total: 0 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 94 22:34:15 GMT
Piper Jackson loses one point.
Total: 0 points.
Proposal 35
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 94 12:12:29 GMT
Proposer: James Huggins
Salutation: Most great leader, I fall upon my knees and beg for
merciful consideration of my proposal.
Proposal: The Imperious Emperor may place any player on inactive
status if requested. Any player on inactive status is exempted from
rule 29. A player on inactive status will be returned to active
status upon submission of any proposal or after one month, whichever
is shorter.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 32.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 5 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 94 15:01:19 GMT
Jon Care loses two points.
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 36
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 94 16:41:26 GMT
Proposer: Faisal Jawdat
Salutation: Oh most Beneficient Emperor, whose mere gaze brings
happiness and light to his most depressed and despairing servant, and
that would also bring happiness and light to his most downtrodden
citizens, but for the fact that the Grace of His Own Greatness has
raised his most loyal subjects into hitherto unheard of heights of
Utopian Existance
Proposal: I humbly propose that your loyal subjects are not getting
enough fruit in their diet, and thus, all subjects should commit
themselves to engaging in a healthy breakfast including fruit every
morning, and further, that all proposals should henceforth be
accompanied by a description of the fruit in question, such as the
delicious nectarine I enjoyed this morning.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Too silly.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 37
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 94 01:20:13 GMT
Proposer: Riff Raffer
Salutation: Glorious Fascist Ruler, our just and magnanimous Lord,
please hear my proposal
Proposal: A glorious rule for the future: A player may sacrifice
himself and his score in a worthy cause, and donate his score to
another player. The sacrificing player's score is reset to zero. In
order for a sacrifice to be considered worthwhile the player must have
submitted at least one proposal and have had it accepted by the
Glorious Emperor. This prevents players from submitting twenty
frivolous proposals under different aliases to waste the Emperors
time.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 33.
Score: 4 points (1 for name).
Total: 10 points.
Proposal 38
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 94 12:37:36 GMT
Proposer: AndersMohn
Salutation: Oh high master of rules of democratic anarchistic
paradoxal insanity. Consider this proposal from an unworthy wimp
Proposal: Any proposal that refers to an old proposal that proposes a
change of the same rules as the new proposal should be ignored if they
do not refer to a proposal to change a rule that came out of a
proposal containg ecactly 2/3 of the number of letters of the new
proposal.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Far too complicated for both myself and most of my loyal
subjects.
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 39
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 21:55:46 GMT
Proposer: Kielpinski
Salutation: O great Lord of All, whose magnanimity surpasses the power
of human apprehension
Proposal: I submit that all proposals be limited to 19 words length,
so as to increase The Emperor's free time.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 34.
Score: 4 points (1 for name).
Total: 4 points.
Report 40
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 94 14:10:07 GMT
Reporter: Natty Dread
Salutation: Oh great and all powerful emperor, before whom we are all
as naught
Report: I regret to imform you that your Humble Scribe has
made not one but two mistakes in his recording of your mighty
proclamations. In proposals 17 and 21, he wrote "pigeon english".
Surely he should have written "pidgin english"?
Decision: Ignored.
Reason: See Report 28.
Score: 0 points.
Total: 0 points.
Report 41
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 94 17:58:34 GMT
Reporter: Fairy Queen
Salutation: Greetings to my favorite emperor
Report: Your fairy queen is here to report that Proposals 16, 18, 20
and 21 should have been awarded an extra point because proposers had
ten letter names.
Decision: Accepted.
[Scores corrected. THS]
Score: 2 points.
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 42
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 14:29:47 GMT
Proposer: bloooojack
Salutation: Greetings to the most high and exalted Emperor, and all
Glory to his Name!
Proposal: Any proposal designed to benefit only its own author shall
be rejected.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: How can any proposal be evaluated on benefits which may or may
not come to pass in the future? How do I know you have not designed
this proposal to benefit only yourself? I am an Emperor, not a
prophet!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 11:54:47 GMT
Ten Letters loses four points.
Total: 4 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:30:48 GMT
Bob Steinke loses one point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 43
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 16:53:44 GMT
Proposer: duanew
Salutation: O Great and Powerful Emperor, do I send my greetings
Proposal: I would like to propose that we declare war on the Nomic
game that calls itself Agora.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: We are a peaceful nation, committed to excellence in the arts,
not belligerent warmongers. Any more talk of war and I'll send the
militia round to keep the peace.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 10:21:43 GMT
Huw Morris loses three points.
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 44
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 15:26:41 GMT
Proposer: Jon Care
Salutation: Oh glorious Emperor, who's holiday sun-tan knows not of
artificial tanning aids
Proposal: I propose that The Humble Scribe be armed, for the
purpose of taking strong action against those subjects who ask "So how
was your holiday then? Did you send us a postcard?"
Decision: Rejected (twice).
Reason: Improper salutation - I have not been on a holiday for two
years - it is only Humble Scribes who can spare the time to
go swanning off to god-forsaken corners of the globe. Us Emporers
have to stay back to look after the pet vultures.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 45
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 17:49:45 GMT
Proposer: Valentinia
Salutation: Oh great and most noble Emperor, a supplicant before you
kneels!
Proposal: I would dare propose a new rule, that those who preface
their proposals with salutations which are, in the opinion of Your
Exaltedness, unusually humble and therefore worthy be rewarded with
one bonus point.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 36.
They'll have to be good though! (Better than yours, at any rate!)
Score: 4 points (1 for name).
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 46
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 19:30:17 GMT
Proposer: Bob Steinke
Salutation: Oh one for whom mere gods are as nothing
Proposal: In addition to the condition of one player reaching exactly
twenty points the game shall also end if the action taken be the most
imperious emperor on the most recent five proposals is reject, ignore,
accept, reject, ignore.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: The game ends when the game ends, and not before!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 47
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 01:07:08 GMT
Proposer: Blob
Salutation: None.
Proposal: A player who has submitted two or more proposals, at least
one of which was accepted, is called an "Experienced Player."
Decision: Accepted as Rule 37.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 48
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 10:54:14 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: To my Imperious Emperor, our only provider of comfort in
this otherwise harsh world
Proposal: The current cruel (but fair) punishment of the Humble Scribe
leaves your people in terror. We must post a proposal within two
weeks of our last proposal, and yet we cannot know the state of the
rules when that proposal is accepted (for the latest proposals before
ours have not been posted yet). We beg for your mercy, and hope that
you will grant an exception from this rule to us during our hour of
need. That is, I ask that you been lenient, and not deduct points for
failing to post a proposal during the period that the Humble Scribe is
away. I can only pray that this proposal itself is not thwarted by
rules proposed after August 19 but before this very day.
Decision: Rejected.
You can always post proposals, stop moaning!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 6 points.
News item 49
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 19:28:07 GMT
Reporter: duanew
Salutation: Oh Great and Powerful Emperor, I, your humble servant,
have a report for you.
Report: The foul fiends of the Nomic game of Agora are plotting to
Annex and otherwise take over Your Fair Game. I am at this time,
attempting to slow these cretins down and will report from time to
time.
Proposal 50
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 22:34:03 GMT
Proposer: Bret Indrelee
Salutation: Hail oh mighty Imperial Emperor
Proposal: I hereby propose that any player who has a first name
begining with B and a last name begining with I receive 1 point each
time a proposal is rejected.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: The Emperor is fed up with proposals based on names, think of
original proposals to win my favour!
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 23:10:06 GMT
Philadelphia DeJesus loses two points.
Total: 2 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 94 07:10:33 GMT
Fox for hire loses one point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 51
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 94 06:00:53 GMT
Proposer: Mojo Eyelid
Salutation: O most benificent emperor, who art as a beacon to us and
sometimes a guide, too
Proposal: I propose to outlaw the use of Monty Python routines as a
function of any part of a proposed rule; while funny, Python now
serves only as a crutch for those too lazy to make up their own
jokes.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: While a crutch, Python humour has, to a certain extent, become
all pervading in today's humor, and since a line would have to be
drawn, how do you define Python humour from non-Python humour, since
all things derive from their precursors.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 52
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 94 20:18:03 GMT
Proposer: Grinsekatz
Salutation: Hi Boss
Proposal: A player may leave a proposal only if he is happier than he
has been when leaving his last proposal. The Imperious
Emperor judges the players happiness by his proposal.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: What is happiness?
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 53
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 05:38:06 GMT
Proposer: A Groveller
Salutation: Most Gracious One!
Proposal: A proposal shall be accepted only if the proposer first
utters 'Sret tuts rifre sopor peht fiyl nodet pecca ebllah slasoporpa
enosu oicarg tsom'
Decision: Rejected.
It was worth a try I suppose!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 54
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 15:34:35 GMT
Proposer: David Lodge
Salutation: Oh person to whom god (if there were such a thing as god -
which there isn't :) is naught but an unfair imitation
Proposal: I propose, that any proposal whose time (ie.
hours+minutes+seconds) is a prime number get a 5 point bonus.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 38.
Score: 4 points (1 for name).
Total: 9 points.
Proposal 55
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 15:36:12 GMT
Proposer: David Lodge
Salutation: Great one
Proposal: I propose that any proposal which uses the word
"canonicallise" in its proper usage gains a bonus of 3 points.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: I wouldnt recognise the correct usage if it bit me on the
nose!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 11 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 16:41:26 GMT
Faisal Jawdat loses one point.
Total: 0 points.
Report 56
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 19:13:40 GMT
Reporter: Chaos Maker
Salutation: O fascist emperor, who strikes terror to the hearts of
your humle subjects, etc., etc..
Report: I regretfully report that The Humble Scribe has taken
leave of his senses during his long exile, leading him to neglect his
duty in enforcing rule 26, and awarding a bonus to submitters of
proposals whose names contain 10 letters (which incidentally includes
myself). I humbly request strict enforcement of Rule 23.
Decision: Rejected.
Score: 0 points.
Total: 2 points.
Proclamation
The Imperious Emperor hereby repeals Rule 23 as it causes too
much trouble for too little gain. The game ain't called
Fascist for nothing.
Proposal 57
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 00:02:57 GMT (prime)
Proposer: A Groveller
Salutation: Quixotic Zephyr! King of Kings!
Proposal: I humbly submit that a proposal shall receive one extra
point if the player genuinely identifies him or herself as a subject
residing in the southern hemisphere. Your Antipodean Servant, A
Groveller.
Decision: Rejected.
Not on your life!
Score: 7 points (1 for name, 5 for prime).
Total: 9 points.
Rule 29 half forfeit
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 01:20:13 GMT
Riff Raffer loses 5 points.
Total: 5 points.
Proposal 58
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 09:06:12 GMT
Proposer: Alexy Marce
Salutation: O powerful Toaster of the Planets!
Proposal: I propose that a report of a mistake made by THS will give
the two extra points only if the proposal which has to be joined to
the report is accepted. Any report without proposal or with a refused
or rejected proposal make the player lose 2 points.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 39.
Additional: Reduce scores to a miniumum of zero. Read "refused" as
"ignored". Reports must accompany proposals from now on.
Score: 4 points (1 for name).
Total: 4 points.
Proposal 59
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 11:07:41 GMT (prime)
Proposer: Huw Morris
Salutation: Oh, most radiant wisdom dispensor
Proposal: I most humbly ask that, just this once, I be exempt from
the loss of my points under rule 29. This is simply because, as
The Humble Scribe was having his flesh burned, I was unable
to tell whether my previous proposal would be rejected or not. I
would have thought it to be the height of bad manners to submit a
proposal not knowing the outcome of one's previous submittal.
(I think he means "submission", Your Effluence. [THS])
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Rules iz Rules.
Score: 1 point.
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 60
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 13:38:09 GMT
Proposer: Matthew Bas
Salutation: Your Beneficient Municipalness
Proposal: I propose that those that seek the 1 point bonus from Rule
26 (either for themselves, or on behalf of others), by reporting that
The Humble Scribe has failed to award it, should instead be
penalised by 2 points for each proposal so reported; that this
proposal should overrule Rule 23 should conflicts occur; and that this
proposal be enforced retrospectively for the increased amusement of
your other loyal subjects.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: I might be a fascist Emperor, but I'm no goddamn nazi, boy!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 2 points.
Report 61
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 94 14:03:52 GMT
Reporter: James Huggins
Salutation: O most gracious Emperor, hear my plea
Report: I beg to inform thee of an error made by thy humble servant,
The Humble Scribe. The current rule state shows rules 30-32
in a single paragraph, as the Scribe has forgotten to place a
paragraph marker after rules 30 and 31.
Score: -2 points (Rule 39).
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 62
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 05:22:55 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: Oh Lord, whose arena of influence is even wider than that
of WWW
Proposal: I ask that proposals ignored because of Rule 12 be once
again brought to your excellency's attention once two other proposals
have been accepted, so ye may re-evaluate their worth.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: When I ignore, I ignore for keeps!
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 8 points.
Proposal 63
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 08:22:17 GMT (prime)
Proposer: A Groveller
Salutation: Lord of all that is fun!
Proposal: I humbly propose that if a players score falls below -2, the
score is then set to 7. A Groveller from Down Under.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: It's impossible for a players score to fall below 0, so this
rule is entirely irrelevant.
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 11 points.
Proposal 64
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 15:04:50 GMT
Proposer: Richard Ecx
Salutation: Excellent Excellency, excelling in excellent
excellence
Proposal: Your Excellency, I propose that the first proposal that
claims to meet Rule 30 by stating that the quick brown fox jumps over
the lazy dog be rejected.
Decision: Accepted, and therefore rejected.
Score: 8 points (1 for name, 3 for alphabet - 1st award).
Total: 8 points.
Proposal 65
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 94 16:04:34 GMT
Proposer: Olivier Marcé
Salutation: Hello
Proposal: What happens with our Glorious Emperor? The proposals fill
the queue! I propose to suspend the game until the come-back of our
King of the Kings, and mail to the players once the game restarts.
Decision: Rejected.
What a silly proposal. Even if the Emperor has been slightly tardy with
his responses, a verdict on this response could only be possible once I
had started responding again!
Score: 1 point.
Total: 1 point.
Proposal 66
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 09:34:39 GMT
Proposer: The Humble Scribe
Salutation: Your Empiricalness
Proposal: Points are taken to have been awarded at the time the
proposal, rather than the decision, was made.
(This means scores can be calculated from the sequence of decisions
and forfeits and decisions can be kept with proposals and need not be
separately dated).
Decision: Accepted as Rule 35.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 3 points.
Proposal 67
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 12:34:46 GMT
Proposer: Ten Letters
Salutation: To He Who Controls Our Destinies With His Whim
Proposal: Players may, at any time, without effect to their score,
submit a "point of order" to highlight illegitimacies.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 40.
Score: 4 points (1 for name).
Total: 12 points.
Point of Order 68
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 12:43:35 GMT
Reporter: Ten Letters
By Rule 22, a player on 10 points must only submit 20 word proposals.
By Rule 34, a proposal of greater than 19 letters [words THS]
will be ignored. By Rule 6, an ignored rule gets no points
[unless you have a ten-letter name THS]. Hence, a person on
10 points cannot advance by proposing rules. The Imperious
Emperor, in his great awesomeness, might like to clarify this
situation to his confused subjects.
So what. Advance (or otherwise) by some other means. Or submit rules
that help you in this respect. TIE.
Proposal 69
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 14:09:59 GMT
Proposer: The Humble Scribe
Salutation: O incandescent supernova of logic
Proposal: A new rule applies to all submissions numbered greater than
or equal to its own proposal.
Comment: Just to make things more explicit.
Decision: Accepted as Rule 41.
Score: 3 points.
Total: 6 points.
Proposal 70
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 15:56:39 GMT
Proposer: Valentinia
Salutation: Oh Light of Lights, before whom the sun is as nothing, I
beseech you to hear the prayer of one who is but as a mote in the eye
of the smallest creature that crawls in the muck!
Proposal: In zealous pursuit of exacerbating injustice, do give one
point to whoever makes a proposal containing Q and Y.
Decision: Accepted, but not as a rule.
Score: 7 points (3 for alphabet - 2nd award, 1 for QY).
Total: 11 points.
Proposal 71
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 17:14:16 GMT (prime)
Proposer: Jim Huggins
Salutation: Oh most gracious and wise Emperor, who treats his subjects
with compassion and grace beyond measure, hear my carefully crafted
proposal
Proposal: Name no 'L'? One, man!
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Thwarted by my present dislike for name rules. The palindrome
looked suspiciously familiar anyway.
Score: 2 points (1 for name).
Total: 5 points.
Proposal 72
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 94 17:36:29 GMT
Proposer: Bret Indrelee
Salutation: O great Imperious Emperor whose great wisdom and
understanding cause him to support an increase in the education of his
subjects
Proposal: Let any subject choose the number base that calculations are
done in when evaluating the acceptability of a proposal.
Decision: Rejected.
Reason: Poppycock!
Score: 1 point.
Total: 2 points.
Proposal 73
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 04:07:42 GMT (prime)
Proposer: A Groveller
Salutation: Pharoah!
Proposal: No "S" in? Up me 2, Emp! Unison? Ha! Or a HP?
Decision: Accepted as Rule 42.
Despite grave doupts about HA OR A HP!
Score: 9 points (1 for name, 5 for palindrome).
Total: 20 points. THE WINNER!
Final scores
Congratulations to A Groveller for a spectacular finish.
- 20 A Groveller <damian@hparc7.aus.hp.com>
- 12 Ten Letters <julian@cs.uq.oz.au>
- 11 David Lodge <D.Lodge@uk03.wins.icl.co.uk>
- 11 Valentinia <kbryant@fas.harvard.edu>
- 8 Richard Ecx <stadt@cs.utwente.nl>
- 6 The Humble Scribe <dbh@doc.ic.ac.uk>
- 5 Riff Raffer <mogens@cs.stanford.edu>
- 5 James Huggins <huggins@umich.edu>
- 4 Kielpinski <dkielpin@hep.uchicago.edu>
- 4 Alexy Marce <alf@lifac.ens-cachan.fr>
- 3 Peter Zeller <pzeller@doc.gov>
- 3 Jon Care <J.Care@swansea.ac.uk>
- 3 Bob Steinke <steinke@c3.lanl.gov>
- 3 Blob <s2119737@cse.unsw.edu.au>
- 3 Huw Morris <hm@rlssp1.bnsc.rl.ac.uk>
- 2 Chaos Maker <sburde@sorter.pathology.rochester.edu>
- 2 Philadelphia DeJesus <mdaum@fnalv.fnal.gov>
- 2 AndersMohn <andmo@aid.no>
- 2 Fairy Queen <angela@cyber.mn.org>
- 2 bloooojack <bluejack@omni.voicenet.com>
- 2 Grinsekatz <Heiner.Schorn@waldschrat.umu.se>
- 2 Matthew Bas <matthew@sa.rl.ac.uk>
- 2 Bret Indrelee <bret@winternet.com>
- 1 Mojo Eyelid <cgree01@emory.edu>
- 1 Fox for hire <foxen@netcom.com>
- 1 duanew <duanew@atlas.com>
- 1 Olivier Marcé <alf@lifac.ens-cachan.fr>
- 0 Natty Dread <np2@doc.ic.ac.uk>
- 0 Harla Quinn <medwards@astro.princeton.edu>
- 0 Faisal Jawdat <faisal@qks.com>
- 0 Piper Jackson <bj5i@musicb.mcgill.ca>
- 0 Per Abrahamsen <abraham@iesd.auc.dk>
- 0 Pierre-Yves Lochou <lochou@cnam.fr>
- 0 Jeff Linthicum <jlinthic@valhalla.cs.wright.edu>
- 0 kiyoko aoki <kiyoko@nwu.edu>
- 0 Richard ekx <stadt@cs.utwente.nl>
- 0 Ritchie Gere <stadt@cs.utwente.nl>
- 0 Don Blaheta <DBlaheta@aol.com>
Final rules
1. The Imperious Emperor's decision is final.
2. Anyone can play.
3. Any player may propose any number of new rules or changes to
existing rules at any time.
4. All proposals must be sent to The Humble Scribe who will
publish them and send them to The Imperious Emperor.
5. The Imperious Emperor will consider each new proposal
submitted and decide whether to accept, reject or ignore it.
6. A player whose proposal is ignored will get no points.
7. A player whose proposal is rejected and whose score is less than
ten points will get one point.
8. A player whose proposal is rejected and whose score is ten points
or more will lose one point.
9. A player whose proposal is accepted will get three points.
10. A game ends when one player has exactly 20 points.
11. The Imperious Emperor may, at any time, modify or remove
any existing rule or enact new rules in order to clarify or otherwise
improve the game.
12. Any proposal from the last player to make a proposal which was not
ignored will be ignored until some other player makes a proposal which
is not ignored.
13. A rule may discriminate between players in any way.
14. Any proposal which is not prefaced by an original phrase of
tribute to The Imperious Emperor will be ignored.
15. The Humble Scribe will publish via the World-Wide Web the
current set of rules, the complete history of proposals and decisions
and the current scores of all players.
16. The Humble Scribe may reword a proposal to clarify
its meaning, so long as this does not change its meaning.
17. The Imperious Emperor is Chris Walsh.
18. The Humble Scribe is Denis Howe.
19. A player who makes a proposal in the form of a palindrome (a
sentence which reads the same backwards as forwards) will receive five
bonus points in addition to the normal score but not if the proposal
is ignored. The other rules are not waived for a palindrome.
20. Whenever a player's score exceeds 20 it is reduced to 16.
21. A player whose proposal is accepted and is judged by The
Imperious Emperor to be the most original proposal so far will
receive one bonus point.
22. Any proposal made by a player with a score of 10 or more must
contain a number of words equal to 30 minus his score. The words in
the salutation are not counted.
23. Repealed.
(Any player may report a mistake made by The Humble Scribe.
If The Imperious Emperor agrees that a mistake was made the
player will get 2 points, otherwise he will get nothing. The
Humble Scribe will be lashed within an inch of his life by
The Sadistic Gaoler for each mistake).
24. Any proposal not including the letter "L" will be ignored.
25. Any proposal by a player whose name begins with an "L" or a "P"
will be rejected. (Note - this rule is still in force despite having
rejected itself - The Humble Scribe).
26. Any proposal from a player whose name has the same number of
letters as the player who is The Imperious Emperor (ie. ten
letters in this game) shall receive one bonus point, regardless of the
proposal's eventual treatment by the Imperious Emperor.
27. A player's name shall be taken to be the name used when submitting
a proposal or report. This may be the player's real name or a
pseudonym. Each player may use any number of different pseudonyms
during a game. Points will be awarded as though each name was a
different player.
28. Any proposal that does not increase the happiness of The
Imperious Emperor's subjects (in the judgement of The
Imperious Emperor) will be rejected.
29. A player who fails to make a new proposal within two weeks of his
previous proposal shall forfeit half his points (rounded up to a whole
number). A player who fails to make a new proposal within four weeks
forfeits their whole score. A proposal shall be judged to have been
made at the time it was received by The Humble Scribe.
30. The first three proposals to contain every letter of the alphabet
will be awarded a bonus of three points.
31. Any submission that is accepted and has more vowels than
consonants and contains at least one word with at least three
consecutive vowels gets an extra 3 points.
32. The Imperious Emperor may declare any player to be exempt
from Rule 29 if requested. A player ceases to be exempt when he
submits a proposal or after one month, whichever is sooner.
33. A player who has had at least one proposal accepted by The
Imperious Emperor may donate his score to another player. The
donor's score is reset to zero.
34. Proposals containing more than 19 words (excluding the salutation)
will be ignored.
35. Points are taken to have been awarded at the time the proposal or
report was submitted, rather than when the decision was made.
36. A player who prefaces his proposals with salutations which are, in
the opinion of The Imperious Emperor, unusually humble and
therefore worthy will receive one bonus point.
37. A player who has submitted two or more proposals, at least
one of which was accepted, is called an "Experienced Player."
38. A player who submits a proposal with a time-stamp for which
hour + minute + second is a prime number will get five
bonus points.
39. A player who submits a proposal may, at the same time, report a
mistake made by The Humble Scribe. If the proposal is
accepted the player will get two bonus points for the report. If a
player submits a report without a proposal or with an ignored or
rejected proposal the player will lose two points or his whole score,
whichever is less.
40. Players may, at any time, without effect to their score,
submit a "Point of Order" to highlight illegitimacies.
41. A new rule applies to all submissions numbered greater than or
equal to its own proposal.
42. No "S" in? Up me 2, Emp! Unison? Ha! Or a HP?